On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 5:10 AM Jens Axboe <ax...@kernel.dk> wrote: > > On 8/21/19 12:42 AM, boojin.kim wrote: > > This patch supports crypto information to be maintained via BIO > > and passed to the storage driver. > > > > To do this, 'bi_aux_private', 'REQ_CYPTE' and 'bi_dun' are added > > to the block layer. > > > > 'bi_aux_private' is added for loading additional private information into > > BIO. > > 'REQ_CRYPT' is added to distinguish that bi_aux_private is being used > > for diskcipher. > > F2FS among encryption users uses DUN(device unit number) as > > the IV(initial vector) for cryptographic operations. > > DUN is stored in 'bi_dun' of bi_iter as a specific value for each BIO. > > > > Before attempting to merge the two BIOs, the operation is also added to > > verify that the crypto information contained in two BIOs is consistent. > > This isn't going to happen. With this, and the inline encryption > proposed by Google, we'll bloat the bio even more. At least the Google > approach didn't include bio iter changes as well. > > Please work it out between yourselves so we can have a single, clean > abstraction that works for both. > > -- > Jens Axboe >
Hi Boojin, We're very keen to make sure that our approach to inline encryption can work with diverse hardware, including Samsung's FMP hardware; if you can see any issues with using our approach with your hardware please let us know. We understand that a possible concern for getting FMP working with our patch series for Inline Encryption Support at https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20190821075714.65140-1-sat...@google.com/ is that unlike some inline encryption hardware (and also unlike the JEDEC UFS v2.1 spec), FMP doesn't have the concept of a limited number of keyslots - to address that difference we have a "passthrough keyslot manager", which we put up on top of our patch series for inline encryption support at https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/kernel/common/+/980137/2 Setting up a passthrough keyslot manager in the request queue of a device allows the device to receive a bio's encryption context as-is with the bio, which is what FMP would prefer. Are there any issues with using the passthrough keyslot manager for FMP? Thanks! Satya _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
