On 2019-9-3 6:54, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 08/31, Chao Yu wrote:
>> There are very similar codes in inc_valid_block_count() and
>> inc_valid_node_count() which is used for available user block
>> count calculation.
>>
>> This patch introduces a new helper get_available_block_count()
>> to include those common codes, and used it instead for cleanup.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuch...@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> v2:
>> - fix panic during recovery
>>  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>> index a89ad8cab821..9c010e6cba5c 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>> @@ -1756,6 +1756,27 @@ static inline bool __allow_reserved_blocks(struct 
>> f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>      return false;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static inline unsigned int get_available_block_count(struct f2fs_sb_info 
>> *sbi,
>> +                                            struct inode *inode, bool cap)
>> +{
>> +    block_t avail_user_block_count;
>> +
>> +    avail_user_block_count = sbi->user_block_count -
>> +                                    sbi->current_reserved_blocks;
>> +
>> +    if (!__allow_reserved_blocks(sbi, inode, cap))
>> +            avail_user_block_count -= F2FS_OPTION(sbi).root_reserved_blocks;
>> +
>> +    if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED))) {
>> +            if (avail_user_block_count > sbi->unusable_block_count)
>> +                    avail_user_block_count -= sbi->unusable_block_count;
>> +            else
>> +                    avail_user_block_count = 0;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return avail_user_block_count;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static inline void f2fs_i_blocks_write(struct inode *, block_t, bool, bool);
>>  static inline int inc_valid_block_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>                               struct inode *inode, blkcnt_t *count)
>> @@ -1782,17 +1803,8 @@ static inline int inc_valid_block_count(struct 
>> f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>  
>>      spin_lock(&sbi->stat_lock);
>>      sbi->total_valid_block_count += (block_t)(*count);
>> -    avail_user_block_count = sbi->user_block_count -
>> -                                    sbi->current_reserved_blocks;
>> +    avail_user_block_count = get_available_block_count(sbi, inode, true);
>>  
>> -    if (!__allow_reserved_blocks(sbi, inode, true))
>> -            avail_user_block_count -= F2FS_OPTION(sbi).root_reserved_blocks;
>> -    if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED))) {
>> -            if (avail_user_block_count > sbi->unusable_block_count)
>> -                    avail_user_block_count -= sbi->unusable_block_count;
>> -            else
>> -                    avail_user_block_count = 0;
>> -    }
>>      if (unlikely(sbi->total_valid_block_count > avail_user_block_count)) {
>>              diff = sbi->total_valid_block_count - avail_user_block_count;
>>              if (diff > *count)
>> @@ -2005,7 +2017,8 @@ static inline int inc_valid_node_count(struct 
>> f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>                                      struct inode *inode, bool is_inode)
>>  {
>>      block_t valid_block_count;
>> -    unsigned int valid_node_count, user_block_count;
>> +    unsigned int valid_node_count;
>> +    unsigned int avail_user_block_count;
>>      int err;
>>  
>>      if (is_inode) {
>> @@ -2027,16 +2040,10 @@ static inline int inc_valid_node_count(struct 
>> f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>  
>>      spin_lock(&sbi->stat_lock);
>>  
>> -    valid_block_count = sbi->total_valid_block_count +
>> -                                    sbi->current_reserved_blocks + 1;
>> -
>> -    if (!__allow_reserved_blocks(sbi, inode, false))
>> -            valid_block_count += F2FS_OPTION(sbi).root_reserved_blocks;
>> -    user_block_count = sbi->user_block_count;
>> -    if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED)))
>> -            user_block_count -= sbi->unusable_block_count;
>> +    valid_block_count = sbi->total_valid_block_count + 1;
>> +    avail_user_block_count = get_available_block_count(sbi, inode, false);
> 
> This doesn't look like same?

Actually, calculations of block count in inc_valid_node_count() and
inc_valid_block_count() should be the same, I've no idea why we use different
policy for reserved block for root user.

Thanks,

> 
>>  
>> -    if (unlikely(valid_block_count > user_block_count)) {
>> +    if (unlikely(valid_block_count > avail_user_block_count)) {
>>              spin_unlock(&sbi->stat_lock);
>>              goto enospc;
>>      }
>> -- 
>> 2.18.0.rc1


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to