On 2019/11/28 13:31, Shinichiro Kawasaki wrote:
> On Nov 25, 2019 / 15:37, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2019/11/14 16:19, Shin'ichiro Kawasaki wrote:
>>> To catch f2fs bugs in write pointer handling code for zoned block
>>> devices, check write pointers of non-open zones that current segments do
>>> not point to. Do this check at mount time, after the fsync data recovery
>>> and current segments' write pointer consistency fix. Or when fsync data
>>> recovery is disabled by mount option, do the check when there is no fsync
>>> data.
>>>
>>> Check two items comparing write pointers with valid block maps in SIT.
>>> The first item is check for zones with no valid blocks. When there is no
>>> valid blocks in a zone, the write pointer should be at the start of the
>>> zone. If not, next write operation to the zone will cause unaligned write
>>> error. If write pointer is not at the zone start, make mount fail and ask
>>> users to run fsck.
>>>
>>> The second item is check between the write pointer position and the last
>>> valid block in the zone. It is unexpected that the last valid block
>>> position is beyond the write pointer. In such a case, report as a bug.
>>> Fix is not required for such zone, because the zone is not selected for
>>> next write operation until the zone get discarded.
>>>
>>> Also move a constant F2FS_REPORT_ZONE from super.c to f2fs.h to use it
>>> in segment.c also.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>>  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h    |   3 +
>>>  fs/f2fs/segment.c | 149 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  fs/f2fs/super.c   |  16 ++++-
>>>  3 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>> index a2e24718c13b..1bb64950d793 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>> @@ -3137,6 +3137,7 @@ int f2fs_lookup_journal_in_cursum(struct f2fs_journal 
>>> *journal, int type,
>>>                     unsigned int val, int alloc);
>>>  void f2fs_flush_sit_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control 
>>> *cpc);
>>>  int f2fs_fix_curseg_write_pointer(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi);
>>> +int f2fs_check_write_pointer(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi);
>>>  int f2fs_build_segment_manager(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi);
>>>  void f2fs_destroy_segment_manager(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi);
>>>  int __init f2fs_create_segment_manager_caches(void);
>>> @@ -3610,6 +3611,8 @@ static inline bool f2fs_blkz_is_seq(struct 
>>> f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int devi,
>>>  
>>>     return test_bit(zno, FDEV(devi).blkz_seq);
>>>  }
>>> +
>>> +#define F2FS_REPORT_NR_ZONES   4096
>>>  #endif
>>>  
>>>  static inline bool f2fs_hw_should_discard(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>>> index 6ece146dab34..29e3b6f62f8c 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>>> @@ -4333,6 +4333,133 @@ static int sanity_check_curseg(struct f2fs_sb_info 
>>> *sbi)
>>>  
>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED
>>>  
>>> +static int check_zone_write_pointer(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>> +                               struct f2fs_dev_info *fdev,
>>> +                               struct blk_zone *zone)
>>> +{
>>> +   unsigned int wp_segno, wp_blkoff, zone_secno, zone_segno, segno;
>>> +   block_t zone_block, wp_block, last_valid_block;
>>> +   unsigned int log_sectors_per_block = sbi->log_blocksize - SECTOR_SHIFT;
>>> +   int i, s, b;
>>> +   struct seg_entry *se;
>>> +
>>> +   wp_block = fdev->start_blk + (zone->wp >> log_sectors_per_block);
>>> +   wp_segno = GET_SEGNO(sbi, wp_block);
>>> +   wp_blkoff = wp_block - START_BLOCK(sbi, wp_segno);
>>> +   zone_block = fdev->start_blk + (zone->start >> log_sectors_per_block);
>>> +   zone_segno = GET_SEGNO(sbi, zone_block);
>>> +   zone_secno = GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, zone_segno);
>>> +
>>> +   if (zone_segno >= MAIN_SEGS(sbi))
>>> +           return 0;
>>> +
>>> +   /*
>>> +    * Skip check of zones cursegs point to, since
>>> +    * fix_curseg_write_pointer() checks them.
>>> +    */
>>> +   for (i = 0; i < NO_CHECK_TYPE; i++)
>>> +           if (zone_secno == GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi,
>>> +                                              CURSEG_I(sbi, i)->segno))
>>> +                   return 0;
>>> +
>>> +   /*
>>> +    * Get last valid block of the zone.
>>> +    */
>>> +   last_valid_block = zone_block - 1;
>>> +   for (s = sbi->segs_per_sec - 1; s >= 0; s--) {
>>> +           segno = zone_segno + s;
>>> +           se = get_seg_entry(sbi, segno);
>>> +           for (b = sbi->blocks_per_seg - 1; b >= 0; b--)
>>> +                   if (f2fs_test_bit(b, se->cur_valid_map)) {
>>> +                           last_valid_block = START_BLOCK(sbi, segno) + b;
>>> +                           break;
>>> +                   }
>>> +           if (last_valid_block >= zone_block)
>>> +                   break;
>>> +   }
>>> +
>>> +   /*
>>> +    * If last valid block is beyond the write pointer, report the
>>> +    * inconsistency. This inconsistency does not cause write error
>>> +    * because the zone will not be selected for write operation until
>>> +    * it get discarded. Just report it.
>>> +    */
>>> +   if (last_valid_block >= wp_block) {
>>> +           f2fs_notice(sbi, "Valid block beyond write pointer: "
>>> +                       "valid block[0x%x,0x%x] wp[0x%x,0x%x]",
>>> +                       GET_SEGNO(sbi, last_valid_block),
>>> +                       GET_BLKOFF_FROM_SEG0(sbi, last_valid_block),
>>> +                       wp_segno, wp_blkoff);
>>> +           return 0;
>>> +   }
>>> +
>>> +   /*
>>> +    * If there is no valid block in the zone and if write pointer is
>>> +    * not at zone start, report the error to run fsck.
>>
>> So we only need to report this as inconsistent status in the condition of
>> discard has been triggered, right? otherwise, f2fs will trigger discard later
>> to reset zone->wp before opening this zone?
> 
> Hmm, my intent was to catch the inconsistency at mount time, assuming the
> inconsistency is not expected at mount time. In other words, I assume that
> discard is triggered for zones without valid blocks before that last clean

IIUC, if there is too many pending discards, put_super() may drop discard 
entries
to avoid delaying umount, so we can not assume all discards are always being
triggered.

So what I mean is for the condition of a) there is valid (including fsycned) 
block,
b) zone->wp is not at correct position, f2fs can handle it by issuing discard. 
Let
me know if I misread this comment.

Thanks,

> umount. If the last sudden f2fs shutdown without clean umount caused the
> inconsistency, it should be reported and fixed, I think.
> 
> SIT valid blocks are referred to check if there is no valid blocks in the 
> zone.
> SIT may be broken due to software bug or hardware flaw, then I think it is the
> better to run fsck rather than discard by f2fs.
> 
> If I miss anything, please let me know.
> 
> --
> Best Regards,
> Shin'ichiro Kawasaki
> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>> +    */
>>> +   if (last_valid_block + 1 == zone_block && zone->wp != zone->start) {
>>> +           f2fs_notice(sbi,
>>> +                       "Zone without valid block has non-zero write "
>>> +                       "pointer, run fsck to fix: wp[0x%x,0x%x]",
>>> +                       wp_segno, wp_blkoff);
>>> +           f2fs_stop_checkpoint(sbi, true);
>>> +           set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK);
>>> +           return -EINVAL;
>>> +   }
>>> +
>>> +   return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int check_dev_write_pointer(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>> +                              struct f2fs_dev_info *fdev) {
>>> +   sector_t nr_sectors = fdev->bdev->bd_part->nr_sects;
>>> +   sector_t sector = 0;
>>> +   struct blk_zone *zones;
>>> +   unsigned int i, nr_zones;
>>> +   unsigned int n = 0;
>>> +   int err = -EIO;
>>> +
>>> +   if (!bdev_is_zoned(fdev->bdev))
>>> +           return 0;
>>> +
>>> +   zones = f2fs_kzalloc(sbi,
>>> +                        array_size(F2FS_REPORT_NR_ZONES,
>>> +                                   sizeof(struct blk_zone)),
>>> +                        GFP_KERNEL);
>>> +   if (!zones)
>>> +           return -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>>> +   /* Get block zones type */
>>> +   while (zones && sector < nr_sectors) {
>>> +
>>> +           nr_zones = F2FS_REPORT_NR_ZONES;
>>> +           err = blkdev_report_zones(fdev->bdev, sector, zones, &nr_zones);
>>> +           if (err)
>>> +                   break;
>>> +           if (!nr_zones) {
>>> +                   err = -EIO;
>>> +                   break;
>>> +           }
>>> +
>>> +           for (i = 0; i < nr_zones; i++) {
>>> +                   if (zones[i].type == BLK_ZONE_TYPE_SEQWRITE_REQ) {
>>> +                           err = check_zone_write_pointer(sbi, fdev,
>>> +                                                          &zones[i]);
>>> +                           if (err)
>>> +                                   break;
>>> +                   }
>>> +                   sector += zones[i].len;
>>> +                   n++;
>>> +           }
>>> +           if (err)
>>> +                   break;
>>> +   }
>>> +
>>> +   kvfree(zones);
>>> +
>>> +   return err;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>  static struct f2fs_dev_info *get_target_zoned_dev(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>>                                               block_t zone_blkaddr)
>>>  {
>>> @@ -4399,6 +4526,10 @@ static int fix_curseg_write_pointer(struct 
>>> f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type)
>>>                 "curseg[0x%x,0x%x]", type, cs->segno, cs->next_blkoff);
>>>     allocate_segment_by_default(sbi, type, true);
>>>  
>>> +   /* check consistency of the zone curseg pointed to */
>>> +   if (check_zone_write_pointer(sbi, zbd, &zone))
>>> +           return -EIO;
>>> +
>>>     /* check newly assigned zone */
>>>     cs_section = GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, cs->segno);
>>>     cs_zone_block = START_BLOCK(sbi, GET_SEG_FROM_SEC(sbi, cs_section));
>>> @@ -4444,11 +4575,29 @@ int f2fs_fix_curseg_write_pointer(struct 
>>> f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>>  
>>>     return 0;
>>>  }
>>> +
>>> +int f2fs_check_write_pointer(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>> +{
>>> +   int i, ret;
>>> +
>>> +   for (i = 0; i < sbi->s_ndevs; i++) {
>>> +           ret = check_dev_write_pointer(sbi, &FDEV(i));
>>> +           if (ret)
>>> +                   return ret;
>>> +   }
>>> +
>>> +   return 0;
>>> +}
>>>  #else
>>>  int f2fs_fix_curseg_write_pointer(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>>  {
>>>     return 0;
>>>  }
>>> +
>>> +int f2fs_check_write_pointer(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>> +{
>>> +   return 0;
>>> +}
>>>  #endif
>>>  
>>>  /*
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
>>> index 1443cee15863..8ca772670c67 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
>>> @@ -2890,8 +2890,6 @@ static int init_blkz_info(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, 
>>> int devi)
>>>     if (!FDEV(devi).blkz_seq)
>>>             return -ENOMEM;
>>>  
>>> -#define F2FS_REPORT_NR_ZONES   4096
>>> -
>>>     zones = f2fs_kzalloc(sbi,
>>>                          array_size(F2FS_REPORT_NR_ZONES,
>>>                                     sizeof(struct blk_zone)),
>>> @@ -3509,7 +3507,8 @@ static int f2fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, 
>>> void *data, int silent)
>>>  
>>>             err = f2fs_recover_fsync_data(sbi, false);
>>>             if (err < 0) {
>>> -                   if (err != -ENOMEM)
>>> +                   if (err != -ENOMEM &&
>>> +                       !is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK))
>>>                             skip_recovery = true;
>>>                     need_fsck = true;
>>>                     f2fs_err(sbi, "Cannot recover all fsync data errno=%d",
>>> @@ -3525,6 +3524,17 @@ static int f2fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, 
>>> void *data, int silent)
>>>                     goto free_meta;
>>>             }
>>>     }
>>> +
>>> +   /*
>>> +    * If the f2fs is not readonly and fsync data recovery succeeds,
>>> +    * check zoned block devices' write pointer consistency.
>>> +    */
>>> +   if (!err && !f2fs_readonly(sb) && f2fs_sb_has_blkzoned(sbi)) {
>>> +           err = f2fs_check_write_pointer(sbi);
>>> +           if (err)
>>> +                   goto free_meta;
>>> +   }
>>> +
>>>  reset_checkpoint:
>>>     /* f2fs_recover_fsync_data() cleared this already */
>>>     clear_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_POR_DOING);
>>> .
> 


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to