On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 09:27:20PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote: > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 05:58:08AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 06:51:33AM -0800, Satya Tangirala wrote: > > > Wire up ufshcd.c with the UFS Crypto API, the block layer inline > > > encryption additions and the keyslot manager. > > > > I think this patch should be merged into the previous patch, as the > > previous one isn't useful without wiring it up. > > > > Satya actually did this originally but then one of the UFS maintainers > requested > the separate patches for (1) new registers, (2) ufshcd-crypto, and (3) > ufshcd.c: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/sn6pr04mb49259f70346e2055c9e0f401fc...@sn6pr04mb4925.namprd04.prod.outlook.com/ > > So, he's not going to be able to make everyone happy :-) > > I personally would be fine with either way.
Oh well, the split between adding functions and callers is highly unusual for Linux development. Adding the defines I can see, especially if they are large (which these aren't). But you'll need to get this accepted by the UFS folks, so I'll shut up now. _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
