On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 03:50:50AM -0800, Satya Tangirala wrote:
> From: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
>
> Wire up ext4 to support inline encryption via the helper functions which
> fs/crypto/ now provides. This includes:
>
> - Adding a mount option 'inlinecrypt' which enables inline encryption
> on encrypted files where it can be used.
>
> - Setting the bio_crypt_ctx on bios that will be submitted to an
> inline-encrypted file.
>
> Note: submit_bh_wbc() in fs/buffer.c also needed to be patched for
> this part, since ext4 sometimes uses ll_rw_block() on file data.
>
> - Not adding logically discontiguous data to bios that will be submitted
> to an inline-encrypted file.
>
> - Not doing filesystem-layer crypto on inline-encrypted files.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <[email protected]>
You've changed enough in this patch that you should probably should add your
Co-developed-by, or at least summarize your changes in between the Signed-off-by
(e.g. "[satyat: use SB_INLINECRYPT and update docs]")
> ---
> Documentation/admin-guide/ext4.rst | 4 ++++
> fs/buffer.c | 7 ++++---
> fs/ext4/ext4.h | 1 +
> fs/ext4/inode.c | 4 ++--
> fs/ext4/page-io.c | 6 ++++--
> fs/ext4/readpage.c | 11 ++++++++---
> fs/ext4/super.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> 7 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/ext4.rst
> b/Documentation/admin-guide/ext4.rst
> index 9443fcef1876..b7cd3bdf827e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/ext4.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/ext4.rst
> @@ -395,6 +395,10 @@ When mounting an ext4 filesystem, the following option
> are accepted:
> Documentation/filesystems/dax.txt. Note that this option is
> incompatible with data=journal.
>
> + inlinecrypt
> + Use blk-crypto, rather than fscrypt, for file content en/decryption.
> + See Documentation/block/inline-encryption.rst.
"fscrypt" refers to the ext4 encryption feature itself. I.e., when inline
encryption is enabled, fscrypt is still being used. Instead you probably want
to write something like:
Encrypt/decrypt the contents of encrypted files using the blk-crypto
framework rather than filesystem-layer encryption. This allows the use
of inline encryption hardware. The on-disk format is unaffected. For
more details, see Documentation/block/inline-encryption.rst.
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> index 4441331d06cc..3917f4b3ec30 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> @@ -1151,6 +1151,7 @@ struct ext4_inode_info {
> #define EXT4_MOUNT_JOURNAL_CHECKSUM 0x800000 /* Journal checksums */
> #define EXT4_MOUNT_JOURNAL_ASYNC_COMMIT 0x1000000 /* Journal Async
> Commit */
> #define EXT4_MOUNT_WARN_ON_ERROR 0x2000000 /* Trigger WARN_ON on error */
> +#define EXT4_MOUNT_INLINECRYPT 0x4000000 /* Inline encryption
> support */
> #define EXT4_MOUNT_DELALLOC 0x8000000 /* Delalloc support */
> #define EXT4_MOUNT_DATA_ERR_ABORT 0x10000000 /* Abort on file data write
> */
> #define EXT4_MOUNT_BLOCK_VALIDITY 0x20000000 /* Block validity checking */
Isn't this ext4-specific flag unused now that you switched to SB_INLINECRYPT
instead?
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index e60aca791d3f..9ac1dd131586 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -1089,7 +1089,7 @@ static int ext4_block_write_begin(struct page *page,
> loff_t pos, unsigned len,
> }
> if (unlikely(err)) {
> page_zero_new_buffers(page, from, to);
> - } else if (IS_ENCRYPTED(inode) && S_ISREG(inode->i_mode)) {
> + } else if (fscrypt_inode_uses_fs_layer_crypto(inode)) {
> for (i = 0; i < nr_wait; i++) {
> int err2;
>
> @@ -3720,7 +3720,7 @@ static int __ext4_block_zero_page_range(handle_t
> *handle,
> /* Uhhuh. Read error. Complain and punt. */
> if (!buffer_uptodate(bh))
> goto unlock;
> - if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) && IS_ENCRYPTED(inode)) {
> + if (fscrypt_inode_uses_fs_layer_crypto(inode)) {
> /* We expect the key to be set. */
> BUG_ON(!fscrypt_has_encryption_key(inode));
> err = fscrypt_decrypt_pagecache_blocks(page, blocksize,
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/page-io.c b/fs/ext4/page-io.c
> index 68b39e75446a..0757145a31b2 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/page-io.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/page-io.c
> @@ -404,6 +404,7 @@ static void io_submit_init_bio(struct ext4_io_submit *io,
> * __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM is set, see comments for bio_alloc_bioset().
> */
> bio = bio_alloc(GFP_NOIO, BIO_MAX_PAGES);
> + fscrypt_set_bio_crypt_ctx_bh(bio, bh, GFP_NOIO);
> bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = bh->b_blocknr * (bh->b_size >> 9);
> bio_set_dev(bio, bh->b_bdev);
> bio->bi_end_io = ext4_end_bio;
> @@ -420,7 +421,8 @@ static void io_submit_add_bh(struct ext4_io_submit *io,
> {
> int ret;
>
> - if (io->io_bio && bh->b_blocknr != io->io_next_block) {
> + if (io->io_bio && (bh->b_blocknr != io->io_next_block ||
> + !fscrypt_mergeable_bio_bh(io->io_bio, bh))) {
> submit_and_retry:
> ext4_io_submit(io);
> }
> @@ -508,7 +510,7 @@ int ext4_bio_write_page(struct ext4_io_submit *io,
> * (e.g. holes) to be unnecessarily encrypted, but this is rare and
> * can't happen in the common case of blocksize == PAGE_SIZE.
> */
> - if (IS_ENCRYPTED(inode) && S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) && nr_to_submit) {
> + if (fscrypt_inode_uses_fs_layer_crypto(inode) && nr_to_submit) {
> gfp_t gfp_flags = GFP_NOFS;
> unsigned int enc_bytes = round_up(len, i_blocksize(inode));
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/readpage.c b/fs/ext4/readpage.c
> index c1769afbf799..68eac0aeffad 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/readpage.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/readpage.c
> @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ static void ext4_set_bio_post_read_ctx(struct bio *bio,
> {
> unsigned int post_read_steps = 0;
>
> - if (IS_ENCRYPTED(inode) && S_ISREG(inode->i_mode))
> + if (fscrypt_inode_uses_fs_layer_crypto(inode))
> post_read_steps |= 1 << STEP_DECRYPT;
>
> if (ext4_need_verity(inode, first_idx))
> @@ -232,6 +232,7 @@ int ext4_mpage_readpages(struct address_space *mapping,
> const unsigned blkbits = inode->i_blkbits;
> const unsigned blocks_per_page = PAGE_SIZE >> blkbits;
> const unsigned blocksize = 1 << blkbits;
> + sector_t next_block;
> sector_t block_in_file;
> sector_t last_block;
> sector_t last_block_in_file;
> @@ -264,7 +265,8 @@ int ext4_mpage_readpages(struct address_space *mapping,
> if (page_has_buffers(page))
> goto confused;
>
> - block_in_file = (sector_t)page->index << (PAGE_SHIFT - blkbits);
> + block_in_file = next_block =
> + (sector_t)page->index << (PAGE_SHIFT - blkbits);
> last_block = block_in_file + nr_pages * blocks_per_page;
> last_block_in_file = (ext4_readpage_limit(inode) +
> blocksize - 1) >> blkbits;
> @@ -364,7 +366,8 @@ int ext4_mpage_readpages(struct address_space *mapping,
> * This page will go to BIO. Do we need to send this
> * BIO off first?
> */
> - if (bio && (last_block_in_bio != blocks[0] - 1)) {
> + if (bio && (last_block_in_bio != blocks[0] - 1 ||
> + !fscrypt_mergeable_bio(bio, inode, next_block))) {
> submit_and_realloc:
> submit_bio(bio);
> bio = NULL;
> @@ -376,6 +379,8 @@ int ext4_mpage_readpages(struct address_space *mapping,
> */
> bio = bio_alloc(GFP_KERNEL,
> min_t(int, nr_pages, BIO_MAX_PAGES));
> + fscrypt_set_bio_crypt_ctx(bio, inode, next_block,
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> ext4_set_bio_post_read_ctx(bio, inode, page->index);
> bio_set_dev(bio, bdev);
> bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = blocks[0] << (blkbits - 9);
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> index f464dff09774..490e748b048c 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> @@ -1504,6 +1504,7 @@ enum {
> Opt_journal_path, Opt_journal_checksum, Opt_journal_async_commit,
> Opt_abort, Opt_data_journal, Opt_data_ordered, Opt_data_writeback,
> Opt_data_err_abort, Opt_data_err_ignore, Opt_test_dummy_encryption,
> + Opt_inlinecrypt,
> Opt_usrjquota, Opt_grpjquota, Opt_offusrjquota, Opt_offgrpjquota,
> Opt_jqfmt_vfsold, Opt_jqfmt_vfsv0, Opt_jqfmt_vfsv1, Opt_quota,
> Opt_noquota, Opt_barrier, Opt_nobarrier, Opt_err,
> @@ -1601,6 +1602,7 @@ static const match_table_t tokens = {
> {Opt_noinit_itable, "noinit_itable"},
> {Opt_max_dir_size_kb, "max_dir_size_kb=%u"},
> {Opt_test_dummy_encryption, "test_dummy_encryption"},
> + {Opt_inlinecrypt, "inlinecrypt"},
> {Opt_nombcache, "nombcache"},
> {Opt_nombcache, "no_mbcache"}, /* for backward compatibility */
> {Opt_removed, "check=none"}, /* mount option from ext2/3 */
> @@ -1812,6 +1814,11 @@ static const struct mount_opts {
> {Opt_jqfmt_vfsv1, QFMT_VFS_V1, MOPT_QFMT},
> {Opt_max_dir_size_kb, 0, MOPT_GTE0},
> {Opt_test_dummy_encryption, 0, MOPT_GTE0},
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION_INLINE_CRYPT
> + {Opt_inlinecrypt, EXT4_MOUNT_INLINECRYPT, MOPT_SET},
> +#else
> + {Opt_inlinecrypt, EXT4_MOUNT_INLINECRYPT, MOPT_NOSUPPORT},
> +#endif
> {Opt_nombcache, EXT4_MOUNT_NO_MBCACHE, MOPT_SET},
> {Opt_err, 0, 0}
> };
> @@ -1888,6 +1895,13 @@ static int handle_mount_opt(struct super_block *sb,
> char *opt, int token,
> case Opt_nolazytime:
> sb->s_flags &= ~SB_LAZYTIME;
> return 1;
> + case Opt_inlinecrypt:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION_INLINE_CRYPT
> + sb->s_flags |= SB_INLINE_CRYPT;
> +#else
> + ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "inline encryption not supported");
> +#endif
> + return 1;
> }
>
> for (m = ext4_mount_opts; m->token != Opt_err; m++)
> @@ -2300,6 +2314,8 @@ static int _ext4_show_options(struct seq_file *seq,
> struct super_block *sb,
> SEQ_OPTS_PUTS("data_err=abort");
> if (DUMMY_ENCRYPTION_ENABLED(sbi))
> SEQ_OPTS_PUTS("test_dummy_encryption");
> + if (sb->s_flags & SB_INLINE_CRYPT)
> + SEQ_OPTS_PUTS("inlinecrypt");
If we're going with the VFS-level mount option flag, it looks like the code to
show it should go in show_sb_opts() in fs/proc_namespace.c instead of here.
> @@ -3808,6 +3824,9 @@ static int ext4_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void
> *data, int silent)
> */
> sbi->s_li_wait_mult = EXT4_DEF_LI_WAIT_MULT;
>
> + /* disable blk-crypto file content encryption by default */
> + sb->s_flags &= ~SB_INLINE_CRYPT;
> +
Don't the flags default to 0? If they do, this part is unnecessary.
- Eric
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
