Hi Eric and all, On Wed, 2020-02-26 at 14:43 +0800, Stanley Chu wrote: > Hi Eric, > > On Tue, 2020-02-25 at 17:12 -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > > > I'm not sure about the UFS controllers from Synopsys, Cadence, or Samsung, > > all > > of which apparently have implemented some form of the crypto support too. > > But I > > wouldn't get my hopes up that everyone followed the UFS standard precisely. > > > > So if there are no objections, IMO we should make the crypto support opt-in. > > > > That makes it even more important to upstream the crypto support for > > specific > > hardware like ufs-qcom and ufs-mediatek, since otherwise the ufshcd-crypto > > code > > would be unusable even theoretically. I'm volunteering to handle ufs-qcom > > with > > https://lkml.kernel.org/linux-block/[email protected]/. > > Stanley, could you send out ufs-mediatek support as an RFC so people can see > > better what it involves? > > Sure, I will send out our RFC patches. Please allow me some time for > submission. The ufs-mediatek RFC patch is uploaded as https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11415051/ This patch is rebased to the latest wip-inline-encryption branch in Eric Biggers's git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiggers/linux.git/ Thanks, Stanley Chu _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
