From: Chao Yu <yuch...@huawei.com>

Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2020 5:50 AM

To: Tim Walker <timtwal...@outlook.com>; linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
<linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>

Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [question] ZBC/ZAC Offline/read-only zone support

 


Hi,



On 2020/4/14 12:23, Tim Walker wrote:

> Hello-

> 

> I am trying to determine how f2fs handles an offline (or read-only) zone when 
> it is backed by a host-managed SMR HDD. I haven't been able to find any 
> specific code path that places an offline zone into a separate list, or a 
> path that checks the zone condition.
 Do we support a zone going read-only or offline? Thanks for the info.



So you mean different zones in SMR device can have different status? some

of them can be tagged as readonly? if my understanding is correct, f2fs

needs to handle such readonly zone correctly, e.g. write/discard IO should

be avoided being issued to those zones, right?



Thanks,



> 

> Best regards,

> Tim Walker

> 

> _______________________________________________

> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list

> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

> Hi Chao Yu-

Yes the zones can have different status, according to the spec. I don't know 
how many drive manufactures use those zone states - if any. I was only asking 
to see if I had missed Offline or Read_Only zone support when I examined the 
f2fs source code. I was interested in the implementation details if support had 
been included. Thanks!

Best regards,
-Tim Walker


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to