Sorry for the late reply. We had a long holiday last week. The patch looks good to me~
Thanks, 2020년 10월 7일 (수) 오후 12:49, Eric Biggers <[email protected]>님이 작성: > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 05:25:02PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > > Add a test which verifies that encryption is done correctly when a file > > on f2fs uses both compression and encryption at the same time. > > > > Patches 1-4 add prerequisites for the test, while patch 5 adds the > > actual test. Patch 2 also fixes a bug which could cause the existing > > test generic/602 to fail in extremely rare cases. See the commit > > messages for details. > > > > The new test passes both with and without the inlinecrypt mount option. > > It requires CONFIG_F2FS_FS_COMPRESSION=y. > > > > I'd appreciate the f2fs developers taking a look. > > > > Note, there is a quirk where the IVs in compressed files are off by one > > from the "natural" values. It's still secure, though it made the test > > slightly harder to write. I'm not sure how intentional this quirk was. > > > > Eric Biggers (5): > > fscrypt-crypt-util: clean up parsing --block-size and --inode-number > > fscrypt-crypt-util: fix IV incrementing for --iv-ino-lblk-32 > > fscrypt-crypt-util: add --block-number option > > common/f2fs: add _require_scratch_f2fs_compression() > > f2fs: verify ciphertext of compressed+encrypted file > > Jaegeuk, Chao, Daeho: any comments on this? > > - Eric > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
