On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 10:29:25AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote: > > Oh I see, the cp-related checks are at the beginning of f2fs_ioctl() too. > > > > In that case a much better approach would be to add __f2fs_ioctl() which is > > called by f2fs_ioctl() and f2fs_compat_ioctl(), and have f2fs_ioctl() and > > f2fs_compat_ioctl() do the cp-related checks but not __f2fs_ioctl(). > > Will this cleanup make sense to you?
I think it would be better to do it the way I suggested. - Eric _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
