From: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>

Since I_DIRTY_TIME and I_DIRTY_INODE are mutually exclusive in i_state,
there's no need to check for I_DIRTY_TIME && !I_DIRTY_INODE.  Just check
for I_DIRTY_TIME.

Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
---
 fs/ext4/inode.c | 8 +++-----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index 4cc6c7834312f..00bca5c18eb65 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -4962,14 +4962,12 @@ static void __ext4_update_other_inode_time(struct 
super_block *sb,
                return;
 
        if ((inode->i_state & (I_FREEING | I_WILL_FREE | I_NEW |
-                              I_DIRTY_INODE)) ||
-           ((inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_TIME) == 0))
+                              I_DIRTY_TIME)) != I_DIRTY_TIME)
                return;
 
        spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
-       if (((inode->i_state & (I_FREEING | I_WILL_FREE | I_NEW |
-                               I_DIRTY_INODE)) == 0) &&
-           (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_TIME)) {
+       if ((inode->i_state & (I_FREEING | I_WILL_FREE | I_NEW |
+                              I_DIRTY_TIME)) == I_DIRTY_TIME) {
                struct ext4_inode_info  *ei = EXT4_I(inode);
 
                inode->i_state &= ~I_DIRTY_TIME;
-- 
2.30.0



_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to