On 11/05/21 10:05 am, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 02:17:00AM +0530, Shreeya Patel wrote:
Theodore / Christoph, since we haven't come up with any final decision with
this discussion, how do you think we should proceed on this?
I think loading it as a firmware-like table is much preferable to
a module with all the static call magic papering over that it really is
just one specific table.
Christoph, I get you point here but request_firmware API requires a
device pointer and I don't
see anywhere it being NULL so I am not sure if we are going in the right
way by loading the data as firmware like table.
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
