On 2021/6/28 20:40, Wang Shilong wrote:
Hi Chao,
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 8:32 PM Chao Yu <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2021/6/25 20:50, Wang Shilong wrote:
From: Wang Shilong <[email protected]>
U32_MAX is reserved for special purpose,
qid_has_mapping() will return false if projid is
4294967295, dqget() will return NULL for it.
So U32_MAX is unsupported Project ID, fix to forbid it.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <[email protected]>
---
fs/f2fs/file.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
index ceb575f99048..861edf3c01d5 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
@@ -3066,6 +3066,8 @@ int f2fs_fileattr_set(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns,
u32 iflags;
int err;
+ if (fa->fsx_projid >= U32_MAX)
unlikely()? if this is really a corner case.
+ return -EINVAL;
if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(F2FS_I_SB(inode))))
return -EIO;
if (!f2fs_is_checkpoint_ready(F2FS_I_SB(inode)))
I prefer to check fsx_projid here to keep line with check order in other
f2fs interfaces.
Just sent a v2 which tried to fix the problem in the VFS.
Shilong,
Agreed, and better.
Thanks,
Thoughts, Shilong?
Thanks,
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel