On 08/16, Yangtao Li wrote: > Sync is always 1, so delete the check of the value.
I don't think so. > > Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <[email protected]> > --- > fs/f2fs/super.c | 6 +----- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c > index 98727e04d271..b823c7e3f303 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c > +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c > @@ -1553,7 +1553,6 @@ static void f2fs_put_super(struct super_block *sb) > int f2fs_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int sync) > { > struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_SB(sb); > - int err = 0; > > if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) > return 0; > @@ -1565,10 +1564,7 @@ int f2fs_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int sync) > if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_POR_DOING))) > return -EAGAIN; > > - if (sync) > - err = f2fs_issue_checkpoint(sbi); > - > - return err; > + return f2fs_issue_checkpoint(sbi); > } > > static int f2fs_freeze(struct super_block *sb) > -- > 2.32.0 _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
