On 08/17, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 07:03:21PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > Freeing preallocated blocks on error would be better than nothing, although 
> > note
> > that the preallocated blocks may have filled an arbitrary sequence of holes 
> > --
> > so simply truncating past EOF would *not* be sufficient.
> > 
> > But really filesystems need to be designed to never expose uninitialized 
> > data,
> > even if I/O errors or a sudden power failure occurs.  It is unfortunate that
> > f2fs apparently wasn't designed with that goal in mind.
> > 
> > In any case, I don't think we can proceed with any other f2fs direct I/O
> > improvements until this data leakage bug can be solved one way or another.  
> > If
> > my patch to remove support for allocating writes isn't acceptable and the
> > desired solution is going to require some more invasive f2fs surgery, are 
> > you or
> > Chao going to work on it?  I'm not sure there's much I can do here.
> 
> Btw, this is generally a problem for buffered I/O as well, although the
> window for exposing uninitialized blocks on a crash tends to be smaller.

How about adding a warning message when we meet an error with preallocated
unwritten blocks? In the meantime, can we get the Eric's patches for iomap
support? I feel that we only need to modify the preallocation and error
handling parts?


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to