On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 10:03:32AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > 
> >     /* 0xa0 */
> > 
> >     /* File range alignment needed for best performance, in bytes. */
> >     __u32   stx_dio_fpos_align_opt;
> 
> This is a common property of both DIO and buffered IO, so no need
> for it to be dio-only property.
> 
>       __u32   stx_offset_align_optimal;
> 

Looking at this more closely: will stx_offset_align_optimal actually be useful,
given that st[x]_blksize already exists?

From the stat(2) and statx(2) man pages:

        st_blksize
                This field  gives  the  "preferred"  block  size  for  efficient
                filesystem I/O.

        stx_blksize
                The "preferred" block size for efficient filesystem I/O.  (Writ‐
                ing  to  a file in smaller chunks may cause an inefficient read-
                modify-rewrite.)

File offsets aren't explicitly mentioned, but I think it's implied they should
be a multiple of st[x]_blksize, just like the I/O size.  Otherwise, the I/O
would obviously require reading/writing partial blocks.

So, the proposed stx_offset_align_optimal field sounds like the same thing to
me.  Is there anything I'm misunderstanding?

Putting stx_offset_align_optimal behind the STATX_DIRECTIO flag would also be
confusing if it would apply to both direct and buffered I/O.

- Eric


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to