Hi Chao, I actually have never used compression on f2fs yet and this image is from an unmodified firmware taken directly from the OTA server, not made by me.
If you can tell me how to check if the file is compressed or not, I'll run it and report back. I never had this sort of issue (a lot of multiple readers causing troubles) before with a regular R/W, uncompressed f2fs partition, so I'm guessing it has something to do with RO or compression feature. Thanks. On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 5:33 PM Chao Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2022/3/14 1:52, Juhyung Park wrote: > > Hi. > > > > We have a production server storing some Android firmwares over a ZFS > > file-system, and we noticed some issues when extracting firmware files > > that use f2fs for Android system partitions. > > > > This is a proprietary environment, so I cannot disclose every detail, > > so I hope you understand. I'll try to elaborate as much as I can. > > > > The server is running Ubuntu 20.04 with Linux v5.15 (recently upgraded > > from v5.13 after noticing RO feature added on v5.14 being required). > > We have a set of scripts extracting Android firmware files. The input > > is typically the OTA zip file and after going through the script, it > > extracts every file and binary image from a given file. > > > > So that includes extracting super (dynamic partition), ext4 system > > partitions with dedup enabled, and now, f2fs system partitions with RO > > and compression enabled. > > > > Our script never had to deal with f2fs before as we only started > > seeing f2fs system partitions with recently released devices. > > > > This is the f2fs mount flag after mounting with `mount -o ro > > system.raw /some/dir`: > > ro,relatime,lazytime,background_gc=on,discard,no_heap,user_xattr,inline_xattr,acl,inline_data,inline_dentry,extent_cache,mode=adaptive,active_logs=2,alloc_mode=reuse,checkpoint_merge,fsync_mode=posix,compress_algorithm=lz4,compress_log_size=2,compress_mode=fs,discard_unit=block > > > > There are *a lot* of files in Android firmware these days, so we try > > to parallelize parts when we can. > > > > This is a snippet of the script: > > ``` > > #!/bin/bash > > <...> > > RSYNC="rsync -ahAXx --inplace --numeric-ids" > > <...> > > for val in system vendor product odm; do > > if ! ls images/$val.raw > /dev/null 2>&1; then continue; fi > > > > mkdir -p fs > > cd fs > > > > mkdir -p $val.mount tmp_$val > > mount -o ro ../images/$val.raw $val.mount > > > > $RSYNC $val.mount/ "$DEST_PWD/fs/$val/" & > > echo $! > $val.pid > > disown > > > > cd $val.mount > > find . -type d -exec mkdir -p "$DEST_PWD/strings/$val/"{} \; > > find . -type d -exec mkdir -p "../tmp_$val/"{} \; > > > > while read file; do strings "$file" > "$DEST_PWD/strings/$val/$file" > > & done < <(find . -type f | grep -v '\.apk\|\.jar\|\.zip') > > wait > > > > <...> > > > > cd ../ > > rm -rf tmp_$val > > cd ../ > > done > > > > wait > > <...> > > for val in system vendor product odm; do > > if ! ls images/$val.raw > /dev/null 2>&1; then continue; fi > > tail --pid=$(cat fs/$val.pid) -f /dev/null > > umount fs/$val.mount > > rmdir fs/$val.mount > > rm -f images/$val.img images/$val.raw 2>/dev/null > > done > > ``` > > > > The offending part is: > > ``` > > $RSYNC $val.mount/ "$DEST_PWD/fs/$val/" & > > find . -type d -exec mkdir -p "$DEST_PWD/strings/$val/"{} \; > > find . -type d -exec mkdir -p "../tmp_$val/"{} \; > > while read file; do strings "$file" > "$DEST_PWD/strings/$val/$file" > > & done < <(find . -type f | grep -v '\.apk\|\.jar\|\.zip') > > wait > > ``` > > > > When that part is reached, the script forks thousands of new processes > > and starts reading from f2fs. (We simply decided to rely on Linux's > > task scheduler and didn't bother to limit the number of > > sub-processes.) > > > > I am able to reliably cause f2fs to return EIO on some files: > > cp: error reading './system/priv-app/some_apk_1/some_apk_1.apk': > > Input/output error > > cp: error reading './system/priv-app/some_apk_2/some_apk_2.apk': > > Input/output error > > cp: error reading './system/priv-app/some_apk_3/some_apk_3.apk': > > Input/output error > > rsync: [sender] read errors mapping > > "/ssd/some_firmware.zip/fs/system.mount/system/priv-app/some_apk_1/some_apk_1.apk": > > Input/output error (5) > > rsync: [sender] read errors mapping > > "/ssd/some_firmware.zip/fs/system.mount/system/priv-app/some_apk_2/some_apk_2.apk": > > Input/output error (5) > > rsync: [sender] read errors mapping > > "/ssd/some_firmware.zip/fs/system.mount/system/priv-app/some_apk_3/some_apk_3.apk": > > Input/output error (5) > > rsync: [sender] read errors mapping > > "/ssd/some_firmware.zip/fs/system.mount/system/priv-app/some_apk_1/some_apk_1.apk": > > Input/output error (5) > > ERROR: system/priv-app/some_apk_1/some_apk_1.apk failed verification > > -- update retained. > > rsync: [sender] read errors mapping > > "/ssd/some_firmware.zip/fs/system.mount/system/priv-app/some_apk_2/some_apk_2.apk": > > Input/output error (5) > > ERROR: system/priv-app/some_apk_2/some_apk_2.apk failed verification > > -- update retained. > > rsync: [sender] read errors mapping > > "/ssd/some_firmware.zip/fs/system.mount/system/priv-app/some_apk_3/some_apk_3.apk": > > Input/output error (5) > > ERROR: system/priv-app/some_apk_3/some_apk_3.apk failed verification > > -- update retained. > > rsync error: some files/attrs were not transferred (see previous > > errors) (code 23) at main.c(1333) [sender=v3.2.3-45-ga28c4558] > > Hi Juhyung, > > Do you enable compression on specified files? if so, do all EIOs come from > compressed > file? > > Thanks, > > > > > The dmesg remains silent. > > > > When I modify the script a little bit and force it to run in a > > single-thread (by removing &), it runs well. > > > > I was able to confirm that it isn't a memory issue. The server has > > 50G+ of free memory, and the issue is still reliably reproducible when > > I defragment the memory by dropping caches and doing `echo 1 > > > /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory`. > > > > I wasn't able to test any recent kernels (v5.16 or v5.17) as it's > > unsupported by ZFS. And it being a production server, I am somewhat > > limited in dabbling around the kernel. > > > > I am planning to test a new kernel with v5.15 + > > f2fs-stable/linux-5.15.y merged. Meanwhile, if this is a new report or > > fixed with newer commits, I'd appreciate a tip. > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
