On 04/29, Chao Yu wrote: > As Yanming reported in bugzilla: > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215916 > > The kernel message is shown below: > > kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/segment.c:2560! > Call Trace: > allocate_segment_by_default+0x228/0x440 > f2fs_allocate_data_block+0x13d1/0x31f0 > do_write_page+0x18d/0x710 > f2fs_outplace_write_data+0x151/0x250 > f2fs_do_write_data_page+0xef9/0x1980 > move_data_page+0x6af/0xbc0 > do_garbage_collect+0x312f/0x46f0 > f2fs_gc+0x6b0/0x3bc0 > f2fs_balance_fs+0x921/0x2260 > f2fs_write_single_data_page+0x16be/0x2370 > f2fs_write_cache_pages+0x428/0xd00 > f2fs_write_data_pages+0x96e/0xd50 > do_writepages+0x168/0x550 > __writeback_single_inode+0x9f/0x870 > writeback_sb_inodes+0x47d/0xb20 > __writeback_inodes_wb+0xb2/0x200 > wb_writeback+0x4bd/0x660 > wb_workfn+0x5f3/0xab0 > process_one_work+0x79f/0x13e0 > worker_thread+0x89/0xf60 > kthread+0x26a/0x300 > ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 > RIP: 0010:new_curseg+0xe8d/0x15f0 > > The root cause is: ckpt.valid_block_count is inconsistent with SIT table, > stat info indicates filesystem has free blocks, but SIT table indicates > filesystem has no free segment. > > So that during garbage colloection, it triggers panic when LFS allocator > fails to find free segment. > > This patch tries to fix this issue by checking consistency in between > ckpt.valid_block_count and block accounted from SIT. > > Cc: [email protected] > Reported-by: Ming Yan <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <[email protected]> > --- > fs/f2fs/segment.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c > index 8c17fed8987e..eddaf3b45b25 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c > @@ -4462,6 +4462,7 @@ static int build_sit_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) > unsigned int readed, start_blk = 0; > int err = 0; > block_t total_node_blocks = 0; > + block_t total_data_blocks = 0; > > do { > readed = f2fs_ra_meta_pages(sbi, start_blk, BIO_MAX_VECS, > @@ -4488,6 +4489,8 @@ static int build_sit_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) > seg_info_from_raw_sit(se, &sit); > if (IS_NODESEG(se->type)) > total_node_blocks += se->valid_blocks; > + else > + total_data_blocks += se->valid_blocks; > > if (f2fs_block_unit_discard(sbi)) { > /* build discard map only one time */ > @@ -4529,6 +4532,8 @@ static int build_sit_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) > old_valid_blocks = se->valid_blocks; > if (IS_NODESEG(se->type)) > total_node_blocks -= old_valid_blocks; > + else > + total_data_blocks -= old_valid_blocks; > > err = check_block_count(sbi, start, &sit); > if (err) > @@ -4536,6 +4541,8 @@ static int build_sit_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) > seg_info_from_raw_sit(se, &sit); > if (IS_NODESEG(se->type)) > total_node_blocks += se->valid_blocks; > + else > + total_data_blocks += se->valid_blocks; > > if (f2fs_block_unit_discard(sbi)) { > if (is_set_ckpt_flags(sbi, CP_TRIMMED_FLAG)) { > @@ -4557,13 +4564,24 @@ static int build_sit_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) > } > up_read(&curseg->journal_rwsem); > > - if (!err && total_node_blocks != valid_node_count(sbi)) { > + if (err) > + return err; > + > + if (total_node_blocks != valid_node_count(sbi)) { > f2fs_err(sbi, "SIT is corrupted node# %u vs %u", > total_node_blocks, valid_node_count(sbi)); > - err = -EFSCORRUPTED; > + return -EFSCORRUPTED; > } > > - return err; > + if (total_data_blocks + total_node_blocks != > + valid_user_blocks(sbi)) { > + f2fs_err(sbi, "SIT is corrupted data# %u vs %u", > + total_data_blocks, > + valid_user_blocks(sbi) - total_node_blocks);
This doesn't work, since some NEW_ADDR is not counted from SIT. > + return -EFSCORRUPTED; > + } > + > + return 0; > } > > static void init_free_segmap(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) > -- > 2.25.1 _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
