Let's try to flush dirty inode again to improve subtle i_blocks mismatch.
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org>
---
fs/f2fs/node.c | 8 ++------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index 836c79a20afc..4181d03a7ef7 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -1943,7 +1943,6 @@ int f2fs_sync_node_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
struct page *page = pvec.pages[i];
bool submitted = false;
- bool may_dirty = true;
/* give a priority to WB_SYNC threads */
if (atomic_read(&sbi->wb_sync_req[NODE]) &&
@@ -1996,11 +1995,8 @@ int f2fs_sync_node_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
}
/* flush dirty inode */
- if (IS_INODE(page) && may_dirty) {
- may_dirty = false;
- if (flush_dirty_inode(page))
- goto lock_node;
- }
+ if (IS_INODE(page) && flush_dirty_inode(page))
+ goto lock_node;
write_node:
f2fs_wait_on_page_writeback(page, NODE, true, true);
--
2.36.1.476.g0c4daa206d-goog
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
