On 2022/9/5 12:59, Zhang Qilong wrote:
The following scenarios exist. process A: process B: ->f2fs_drop_extent_tree ->f2fs_update_extent_cache_range ->f2fs_update_extent_tree_range ->write_lock ->set_inode_flag ->is_inode_flag_set ->__free_extent_tree // Shouldn't // have been // cleaned up // here ->write_lockIn this case, the "FI_NO_EXTENT" flag is set between f2fs_update_extent_tree_range and is_inode_flag_set by other process. it leads to clearing the whole exten tree which should not have happened. And we fix it by move the setting it to the range of write_lock. Fixes:5f281fab9b9a3 ("f2fs: disable extent_cache for fcollapse/finsert inodes") Signed-off-by: Zhang Qilong <zhangqilo...@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <c...@kernel.org> Thanks, _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
