On 2022/8/31 10:24, Shuqi Zhang wrote:
This is a BUG_ON issue as follows when running xfstest-generic-503:
WARNING: CPU: 21 PID: 1385 at fs/f2fs/inode.c:762 f2fs_evict_inode+0x847/0xaa0
Modules linked in:
CPU: 21 PID: 1385 Comm: umount Not tainted 5.19.0-rc5+ #73
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.14.0-4.fc34 
04/01/2014

Call Trace:
evict+0x129/0x2d0
dispose_list+0x4f/0xb0
evict_inodes+0x204/0x230
generic_shutdown_super+0x5b/0x1e0
kill_block_super+0x29/0x80
kill_f2fs_super+0xe6/0x140
deactivate_locked_super+0x44/0xc0
deactivate_super+0x79/0x90
cleanup_mnt+0x114/0x1a0
__cleanup_mnt+0x16/0x20
task_work_run+0x98/0x100
exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x3d0/0x3e0
syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x12/0x30
do_syscall_64+0x42/0x80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0

Function flow analysis when BUG occurs:
f2fs_fallocate                    mmap
                                   do_page_fault
                                     pte_spinlock  // ---lock_pte
                                     do_wp_page
                                       wp_page_shared
                                         pte_unmap_unlock   // unlock_pte
                                           do_page_mkwrite
                                           f2fs_vm_page_mkwrite
                                             down_read(invalidate_lock)
                                             lock_page
                                             if (PageMappedToDisk(page))
                                               goto out;
                                             // set_page_dirty  --NOT RUN
                                             out: up_read(invalidate_lock);
                                         finish_mkwrite_fault // unlock_pte
f2fs_collapse_range
   down_write(i_mmap_sem)
   truncate_pagecache
     unmap_mapping_pages
       i_mmap_lock_write // down_write(i_mmap_rwsem)
         ......
         zap_pte_range
           pte_offset_map_lock // ---lock_pte
            set_page_dirty
             f2fs_dirty_data_folio
               if (!folio_test_dirty(folio)) {
                                         fault_dirty_shared_page
                                           set_page_dirty
                                             f2fs_dirty_data_folio
                                               if (!folio_test_dirty(folio)) {
                                                 filemap_dirty_folio
                                                 f2fs_update_dirty_folio // ++
                                               }
                                             unlock_page
                 filemap_dirty_folio
                 f2fs_update_dirty_folio // page count++
               }
           pte_unmap_unlock  // --unlock_pte
       i_mmap_unlock_write  // up_write(i_mmap_rwsem)
   truncate_inode_pages
   up_write(i_mmap_sem)

Will this race condition affact f2fs private field update?

Thanks,


When race happens between mmap-do_page_fault-wp_page_shared and
fallocate-truncate_pagecache-zap_pte_range, the zap_pte_range calls
function set_page_dirty without page lock. Besides, though
truncate_pagecache has immap and pte lock, wp_page_shared calls
fault_dirty_shared_page without any. In this case, two threads race
in f2fs_dirty_data_folio function. Page is set to dirty only ONCE,
but the count is added TWICE by calling filemap_dirty_folio.
Thus the count of dirty page cannot accord with the real dirty pages.

Following is the solution to in case of race happens without any lock.
Since folio_test_set_dirty in filemap_dirty_folio is atomic, judge return
value will not be at risk of race.

Signed-off-by: Shuqi Zhang <zhangshu...@huawei.com>
---
  fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 3 +--
  fs/f2fs/data.c       | 3 +--
  fs/f2fs/node.c       | 3 +--
  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
index 8259e0fa97e1..3a3329bf1033 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
@@ -448,8 +448,7 @@ static bool f2fs_dirty_meta_folio(struct address_space 
*mapping,
if (!folio_test_uptodate(folio))
                folio_mark_uptodate(folio);
-       if (!folio_test_dirty(folio)) {
-               filemap_dirty_folio(mapping, folio);
+       if (filemap_dirty_folio(mapping, folio)) {
                inc_page_count(F2FS_M_SB(mapping), F2FS_DIRTY_META);
                set_page_private_reference(&folio->page);
                return true;
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
index aa3ccddfa037..16c39bd948a0 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
@@ -3697,8 +3697,7 @@ static bool f2fs_dirty_data_folio(struct address_space 
*mapping,
                folio_mark_uptodate(folio);
        BUG_ON(folio_test_swapcache(folio));
- if (!folio_test_dirty(folio)) {
-               filemap_dirty_folio(mapping, folio);
+       if (filemap_dirty_folio(mapping, folio)) {
                f2fs_update_dirty_folio(inode, folio);
                return true;
        }
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index e06a0c478b39..3506ffcb31f8 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -2147,8 +2147,7 @@ static bool f2fs_dirty_node_folio(struct address_space 
*mapping,
        if (IS_INODE(&folio->page))
                f2fs_inode_chksum_set(F2FS_M_SB(mapping), &folio->page);
  #endif
-       if (!folio_test_dirty(folio)) {
-               filemap_dirty_folio(mapping, folio);
+       if (filemap_dirty_folio(mapping, folio)) {
                inc_page_count(F2FS_M_SB(mapping), F2FS_DIRTY_NODES);
                set_page_private_reference(&folio->page);
                return true;


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to