On 11/12, Yangtao Li wrote:
> Complaint from Matthew Wilcox in another similar place:
> 
>       "submit?  You don't submit anything at the 'submit' label.
>       it should be called 'skip' or something.  But I think this
>       is just badly written and you don't need a goto at all."
> 
> Let's remove submit label for readability.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/segment.c | 6 ++----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index 3654c30e0517..0a72e787c585 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -1144,13 +1144,11 @@ static int __submit_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info 
> *sbi,
>               if (time_to_inject(sbi, FAULT_DISCARD)) {
>                       f2fs_show_injection_info(sbi, FAULT_DISCARD);
>                       err = -EIO;
> -                     goto submit;
> -             }
> -             err = __blkdev_issue_discard(bdev,
> +             } else
> +                     err = __blkdev_issue_discard(bdev,
>                                       SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(start),
>                                       SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(len),
>                                       GFP_NOFS, &bio);

Thanks. I added {} to meet the coding style.

> -submit:
>               if (err) {
>                       spin_lock_irqsave(&dc->lock, flags);
>                       if (dc->state == D_PARTIAL)
> -- 
> 2.25.1


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to