>>>>> I don't think this needs cleanup, other part looks good to me.
>>>>
>>>> What is the point here comparing to the below? fyi; I picked this change.
>>>
>>> IIUC, the question is for Yangtao? :P
>> 
>> Heh, to you. :) I think either looks fine. Hence,
> 
> Ah... alright.

> I comment on this cleanup, due to I don't see any benefit, since both 
> implementations are very common in kernel codes.

Mainly the cleanup of f2fs_init_compress_cache() and f2fs_init_bioset 
functions().
For other parts, I don't think it is necessary to take up too many lines, just 
deal with them by the way. :D

Thx,
Yangtao


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to