On 02/13, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2023/2/11 5:32, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > MAIN_SEGS is for data area, while TOTAL_SEGS includes data and metadata.
> 
> Good catch!
> 
> Could you please add fixes line?

It seems this is not a bug case, and exisits from the first F2FS patch. :)

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >   fs/f2fs/segment.h | 4 ++--
> >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.h b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
> > index 8ee5e5db9287..6003fbaf4b7d 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.h
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
> > @@ -720,7 +720,7 @@ static inline unsigned char curseg_alloc_type(struct 
> > f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >   static inline void check_seg_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, unsigned int 
> > segno)
> >   {
> > -   f2fs_bug_on(sbi, segno > TOTAL_SEGS(sbi) - 1);
> > +   f2fs_bug_on(sbi, segno > MAIN_SEGS(sbi) - 1);
> >   }
> >   static inline void verify_fio_blkaddr(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
> > @@ -775,7 +775,7 @@ static inline int check_block_count(struct f2fs_sb_info 
> > *sbi,
> >     /* check segment usage, and check boundary of a given segment number */
> >     if (unlikely(GET_SIT_VBLOCKS(raw_sit) > usable_blks_per_seg
> > -                                   || segno > TOTAL_SEGS(sbi) - 1)) {
> > +                                   || segno > MAIN_SEGS(sbi) - 1)) {
> >             f2fs_err(sbi, "Wrong valid blocks %d or segno %u",
> >                      GET_SIT_VBLOCKS(raw_sit), segno);
> >             set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK);


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to