> F2FS_RW_ATTR looks more common to me. My idea is to add macro like this:
F2FS_SBI_GENERAL_RW_ATTR(node_io_flag); CPRC_INFO_GENERAL_RW_ATTR(ckpt_thread_ioprio); ...... F2FS_SBI_RW_ATTR(umount_discard_timeout, interval_time[UMOUNT_DISCARD_TIMEOUT]); It seems unnecessary to repeat a bunch of the same things just to add a parameter. Are there any problems using the new macros? Thx, Yangtao _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
