On 7/11/23 10:52, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
>>>> index ca31163da00a55..8d11d4a5ec331d 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
>>>> @@ -1560,7 +1560,8 @@ static void destroy_device_list(struct f2fs_sb_info
>>>> *sbi)
>>>> {
>>>> int i;
>>>>
>>>> - for (i = 0; i < sbi->s_ndevs; i++) {
>>>
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED
>>>
>>>> + kvfree(FDEV(0).blkz_seq);
>>>
>>> #endif
>>
>> This should not be needed since for the !CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED case,
>> FDEV(0).blkz_seq should always be NULL. However, what I think may be missing
>> is
>> "FDEV(0).blkz_seq = NULL;" after the kvfree() call. No ?
>
> I was looking at a glance of this:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/[email protected]/T/#u
OK. Got it.
I still think that it may be safer to add the NULL affectation though.
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
