On 07/06, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2023/7/6 1:30, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 07/04, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > On 2023/7/4 18:53, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > > On 07/03, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > > > On 2023/6/15 0:10, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > > > > If there're huge # of small discards, this will increase checkpoint
> > > > > > latency
> > > > > > insanely. Let's issue small discards only by trim.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Change log from v1:
> > > > > > - move the skip logic to avoid dangling objects
> > > > > >
> > > > > > fs/f2fs/segment.c | 2 +-
> > > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > > > > > index 8c7af8b4fc47..0457d620011f 100644
> > > > > > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > > > > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > > > > > @@ -2193,7 +2193,7 @@ void f2fs_clear_prefree_segments(struct
> > > > > > f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > > > > > len = next_pos - cur_pos;
> > > > > > if (f2fs_sb_has_blkzoned(sbi) ||
> > > > > > - (force && len < cpc->trim_minlen))
> > > > > > + !force || len <
> > > > > > cpc->trim_minlen)
> > > > > > goto skip;
> > > > >
> > > > > Sorry for late reply.
> > > > >
> > > > > We have a configuration for such case, what do you think of setting
> > > > > max_small_discards to zero? otherwise, w/ above change,
> > > > > max_small_discards
> > > > > logic may be broken?
> > > > >
> > > > > What: /sys/fs/f2fs/<disk>/max_small_discards
> > > > > Date: November 2013
> > > > > Contact: "Jaegeuk Kim" <jaegeuk....@samsung.com>
> > > > > Description: Controls the issue rate of discard commands that
> > > > > consist of small
> > > > > blocks less than 2MB. The candidates to be
> > > > > discarded are cached until
> > > > > checkpoint is triggered, and issued during the
> > > > > checkpoint.
> > > > > By default, it is disabled with 0.
> > > > >
> > > > > Or, if we prefer to disable small_discards by default, what about
> > > > > below change:
> > > >
> > > > I think small_discards is fine, but need to avoid long checkpoint
> > > > latency only.
> > >
> > > I didn't get you, do you mean we can still issue small discard by
> > > fstrim, so small_discards functionality is fine?
> >
> > You got the point.
>
> Well, actually, what I mean is max_small_discards sysfs entry's functionality
> is broken. Now, the entry can not be used to control number of small discards
> committed by checkpoint.
Could you descrbie this problem first?
>
> I think there is another way to achieve "avoid long checkpoint latency caused
> by committing huge # of small discards", the way is we can set
> max_small_discards
> to small value or zero, w/ such configuration, it will take checkpoint much
> less
> time or no time to committing small discard due to below control logic:
>
> f2fs_flush_sit_entries()
> {
> ...
> if (!(cpc->reason & CP_DISCARD)) {
> cpc->trim_start = segno;
> add_discard_addrs(sbi, cpc, false);
> }
> ...
> }
>
> add_discard_addrs()
> {
> ...
> while (force || SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info->nr_discards <=
> SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info->max_discards) {
>
> It will break the loop once nr_discards is larger than max_discards, if
> max_discards is set to zero, checkpoint won't take time to handle small
> discards.
>
> ...
> if (!de) {
> de = f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc(discard_entry_slab,
> GFP_F2FS_ZERO, true, NULL);
> de->start_blkaddr = START_BLOCK(sbi, cpc->trim_start);
> list_add_tail(&de->list, head);
> }
> ...
> }
> ...
>
> Thanks,
>
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > From eb89d9b56e817e3046d7fa17165b12416f09d456 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
> > > > > 2001
> > > > > From: Chao Yu <c...@kernel.org>
> > > > > Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 09:06:53 +0800
> > > > > Subject: [PATCH] Revert "f2fs: enable small discard by default"
> > > > >
> > > > > This reverts commit d618ebaf0aa83d175658aea5291e0c459d471d39 in order
> > > > > to disable small discard by default, so that if there're huge number
> > > > > of
> > > > > small discards, it will decrease checkpoint's latency obviously.
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, this patch reverts 9ac00e7cef10 ("f2fs: do not issue small
> > > > > discard
> > > > > commands during checkpoint"), due to it breaks small discard feature
> > > > > which
> > > > > may be configured via sysfs entry max_small_discards.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fixes: 9ac00e7cef10 ("f2fs: do not issue small discard commands
> > > > > during checkpoint")
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <c...@kernel.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > fs/f2fs/segment.c | 4 ++--
> > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > > > > index 14c822e5c9c9..0a313368f18b 100644
> > > > > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > > > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > > > > @@ -2193,7 +2193,7 @@ void f2fs_clear_prefree_segments(struct
> > > > > f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > > > > len = next_pos - cur_pos;
> > > > >
> > > > > if (f2fs_sb_has_blkzoned(sbi) ||
> > > > > - !force || len <
> > > > > cpc->trim_minlen)
> > > > > + (force && len < cpc->trim_minlen))
> > > > > goto skip;
> > > > >
> > > > > f2fs_issue_discard(sbi, entry->start_blkaddr +
> > > > > cur_pos,
> > > > > @@ -2269,7 +2269,7 @@ static int create_discard_cmd_control(struct
> > > > > f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > > > > atomic_set(&dcc->queued_discard, 0);
> > > > > atomic_set(&dcc->discard_cmd_cnt, 0);
> > > > > dcc->nr_discards = 0;
> > > > > - dcc->max_discards = MAIN_SEGS(sbi) << sbi->log_blocks_per_seg;
> > > > > + dcc->max_discards = 0;
> > > > > dcc->max_discard_request = DEF_MAX_DISCARD_REQUEST;
> > > > > dcc->min_discard_issue_time = DEF_MIN_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME;
> > > > > dcc->mid_discard_issue_time = DEF_MID_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME;
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.40.1
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > f2fs_issue_discard(sbi,
> > > > > > entry->start_blkaddr + cur_pos,
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
