From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <kris...@collabora.com>

Introduce a dentry revalidation helper to be used by case-insensitive
filesystems to check if it is safe to reuse a negative dentry.

A negative dentry is safe to be reused on a case-insensitive lookup if
it was created during a case-insensitive lookup and this is not a lookup
that will instantiate a dentry. If this is a creation lookup, we also
need to make sure the name matches sensitively the name under lookup in
order to assure the name preserving semantics.

dentry->d_name is only checked by the case-insensitive d_revalidate hook
in the LOOKUP_CREATE/LOOKUP_RENAME_TARGET case since, for these cases,
d_revalidate is always called with the parent inode read-locked, and
therefore the name cannot change from under us.

d_revalidate is only called in 4 places: lookup_dcache, __lookup_slow,
lookup_open and lookup_fast:

  - lookup_dcache always calls it with zeroed flags, with the exception
    of when coming from __lookup_hash, which needs the parent locked
    already, for instance in the open/creation path, which is locked in
    open_last_lookups.

  - In __lookup_slow, either the parent inode is read locked by the
    caller (lookup_slow), or it is called with no flags (lookup_one*).
    The read lock suffices to prevent ->d_name modifications, with the
    exception of one case: __d_unalias, will call __d_move to fix a
    directory accessible from multiple dentries, which effectively swaps
    ->d_name while holding only the shared read lock.  This happens
    through this flow:

    lookup_slow()  //LOOKUP_CREATE
      d_lookup()
        ->d_lookup()
          d_splice_alias()
            __d_unalias()
              __d_move()

    Nevertheless, this case is not a problem because negative dentries
    are not allowed to be moved with __d_move.

  - lookup_open also requires the parent to be locked in the creation
    case, which is done in open_last_lookups.

  - lookup_fast will indeed be called with the parent unlocked, but it
    shouldn't be called with LOOKUP_CREATE.  Either it is called in the
    link_path_walk, where nd->flags doesn't have LOOKUP_CREATE yet or in
    open_last_lookups. But, in this case, it also never has LOOKUP_CREATE,
    because it is only called on the !O_CREAT case, which means op->intent
    doesn't have LOOKUP_CREAT (set in build_open_flags only if O_CREAT is
    set).

Finally, for the LOOKUP_RENAME_TARGET, we are doing a rename, so the
parents inodes are also locked.

Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <ty...@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <kris...@collabora.com>

---
Changes since v3:
  - Add comment regarding creation (Eric)
  - Reorder checks to clarify !flags meaning (Eric)
  - Add commit message explanaton of the inode read lock wrt.
    __d_move. (Eric)
Changes since v2:
  - Add comments to all rejection cases (Eric)
  - safeguard against filesystem creating dentries without LOOKUP flags
---
 fs/libfs.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/libfs.c b/fs/libfs.c
index 5b851315eeed..ed04c4dcc312 100644
--- a/fs/libfs.c
+++ b/fs/libfs.c
@@ -1462,9 +1462,64 @@ static int generic_ci_d_hash(const struct dentry 
*dentry, struct qstr *str)
        return 0;
 }
 
+static inline int generic_ci_d_revalidate(struct dentry *dentry,
+                                         const struct qstr *name,
+                                         unsigned int flags)
+{
+       if (d_is_negative(dentry)) {
+               const struct dentry *parent = READ_ONCE(dentry->d_parent);
+               const struct inode *dir = READ_ONCE(parent->d_inode);
+
+               if (dir && needs_casefold(dir)) {
+                       /*
+                        * Negative dentries created prior to turning the
+                        * directory case-insensitive cannot be trusted, since
+                        * they don't ensure any possible case version of the
+                        * filename doesn't exist.
+                        */
+                       if (!d_is_casefold_lookup(dentry))
+                               return 0;
+
+                       /*
+                        * Filesystems will call into d_revalidate without
+                        * setting LOOKUP_ flags even for file creation (see
+                        * lookup_one* variants).  Reject negative dentries in
+                        * this case, since we can't know for sure it won't be
+                        * used for creation.
+                        */
+                       if (!flags)
+                               return 0;
+
+                       /*
+                        * If the lookup is for creation, then a negative dentry
+                        * can only be reused if it's a case-sensitive match,
+                        * not just a case-insensitive one.  This is needed to
+                        * make the new file be created with the name the user
+                        * specified, preserving case.
+                        */
+                       if (flags & (LOOKUP_CREATE | LOOKUP_RENAME_TARGET)) {
+                               /*
+                                * ->d_name won't change from under us in the
+                                * creation path only, since d_revalidate during
+                                * creation and renames is always called with
+                                * the parent inode locked.  It isn't the case
+                                * for all lookup callpaths, so ->d_name must
+                                * not be touched outside
+                                * (LOOKUP_CREATE|LOOKUP_RENAME_TARGET) context.
+                                */
+                               if (dentry->d_name.len != name->len ||
+                                   memcmp(dentry->d_name.name, name->name, 
name->len))
+                                       return 0;
+                       }
+               }
+       }
+       return 1;
+}
+
 static const struct dentry_operations generic_ci_dentry_ops = {
        .d_hash = generic_ci_d_hash,
        .d_compare = generic_ci_d_compare,
+       .d_revalidate_name = generic_ci_d_revalidate,
 };
 #endif
 
-- 
2.41.0



_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to