LGTM

On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 10:06 AM Jaegeuk Kim <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Even if f2fs was rebooted as staying checkpoint=disable, let's match the write
> pointers all the time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/super.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> index 617340e9ea7f..9a874b4d1501 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> @@ -4741,7 +4741,7 @@ static int f2fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void 
> *data, int silent)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_QUOTA
>         f2fs_recover_quota_end(sbi, quota_enabled);
>  #endif
> -
> +reset_checkpoint:
>         /*
>          * If the f2fs is not readonly and fsync data recovery succeeds,
>          * check zoned block devices' write pointer consistency.
> @@ -4752,7 +4752,6 @@ static int f2fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void 
> *data, int silent)
>                         goto free_meta;
>         }
>
> -reset_checkpoint:
>         f2fs_init_inmem_curseg(sbi);
>
>         /* f2fs_recover_fsync_data() cleared this already */
> --
> 2.43.0.rc2.451.g8631bc7472-goog
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to