On 2024/4/10 4:34, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
f2fs_ra_meta_pages can try to read ahead on invalid block address which is
not the corruption case.

In which case we will read ahead invalid meta pages? recovery w/ META_POR?

Thanks,


Fixes: 31f85ccc84b8 ("f2fs: unify the error handling of f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr")
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org>
---
  fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 9 +++++----
  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
index eac698b8dd38..b01320502624 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
@@ -179,22 +179,22 @@ static bool __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(struct f2fs_sb_info 
*sbi,
                break;
        case META_SIT:
                if (unlikely(blkaddr >= SIT_BLK_CNT(sbi)))
-                       goto err;
+                       goto check_only;
                break;
        case META_SSA:
                if (unlikely(blkaddr >= MAIN_BLKADDR(sbi) ||
                        blkaddr < SM_I(sbi)->ssa_blkaddr))
-                       goto err;
+                       goto check_only;
                break;
        case META_CP:
                if (unlikely(blkaddr >= SIT_I(sbi)->sit_base_addr ||
                        blkaddr < __start_cp_addr(sbi)))
-                       goto err;
+                       goto check_only;
                break;
        case META_POR:
                if (unlikely(blkaddr >= MAX_BLKADDR(sbi) ||
                        blkaddr < MAIN_BLKADDR(sbi)))
-                       goto err;
+                       goto check_only;
                break;
        case DATA_GENERIC:
        case DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE:
@@ -228,6 +228,7 @@ static bool __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(struct f2fs_sb_info 
*sbi,
        return true;
  err:
        f2fs_handle_error(sbi, ERROR_INVALID_BLKADDR);
+check_only:
        return false;
  }


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to