Dear Chao,
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 6:37 PM Chao Yu <c...@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Otherwise, it breaks pinfile's sematics.
>
> Cc: Daeho Jeong <daeh...@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <c...@kernel.org>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/data.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index bee1e45f76b8..e29000d83d52 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -1596,7 +1596,8 @@ int f2fs_map_blocks(struct inode *inode, struct
> f2fs_map_blocks *map, int flag)
>
> /* use out-place-update for direct IO under LFS mode */
> if (map->m_may_create &&
> - (is_hole || (f2fs_lfs_mode(sbi) && flag == F2FS_GET_BLOCK_DIO))) {
> + (is_hole || (flag == F2FS_GET_BLOCK_DIO && (f2fs_lfs_mode(sbi) &&
> + (!f2fs_sb_has_blkzoned(sbi) || !f2fs_is_pinned_file(inode)))))) {
Excuse me I a little question， should pin files not be written in OPU
mode regardless of device type(conventional or zone)?
thanks!
> if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) {
> err = -EIO;
> goto sync_out;
> --
> 2.40.1
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
