On 05/07, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> From: Daeho Jeong <daehoje...@google.com>
>
> Following the semantic for dirty segments in checkpoint disabled mode,
> apply the same rule to dirty sections.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daeho Jeong <daehoje...@google.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/segment.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index 6474b7338e81..2463398b243f 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -771,8 +771,11 @@ static void __locate_dirty_segment(struct f2fs_sb_info
> *sbi, unsigned int segno,
> block_t valid_blocks =
> get_valid_blocks(sbi, segno, true);
>
> - f2fs_bug_on(sbi, unlikely(!valid_blocks ||
> - valid_blocks == CAP_BLKS_PER_SEC(sbi)));
> + if (!is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED))
> + f2fs_bug_on(sbi, unlikely(!valid_blocks));
> +
> + f2fs_bug_on(sbi, unlikely(valid_blocks ==
> + CAP_BLKS_PER_SEC(sbi)));
What about:
f2fs_bug_on(sbi,
(!is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED) && !valid_blocks) ||
valid_blocks == CAP_BLKS_PER_SEC(sbi));
>
> if (!IS_CURSEC(sbi, secno))
> set_bit(secno, dirty_i->dirty_secmap);
> --
> 2.45.0.rc1.225.g2a3ae87e7f-goog
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
