On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 2:26 PM Chao Yu <c...@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On 2024/6/5 13:59, Zhiguo Niu wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 11:48 AM Chao Yu <c...@kernel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2024/6/3 17:05, Zhiguo Niu wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 3:41 PM Chao Yu <c...@kernel.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2024/5/20 19:36, Zhiguo Niu wrote:
> >>>>> Now atgc can be enabled based on the following conditions:
> >>>>> -ATGC mount option is set
> >>>>> -elapsed_time is more than atgc_age_threshold already
> >>>>> but these conditions are check when umounted->mounted device again.
> >>>>> If the device has not be umounted->mounted for a long time, atgc can
> >>>>> not work even the above conditions met.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It is better to enable atgc dynamiclly when user change 
> >>>>> atgc_age_threshold
> >>>>> meanwhile this vale is less than elapsed_time and ATGC mount option is 
> >>>>> on.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Zhiguo Niu <zhiguo....@unisoc.com>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>>     fs/f2fs/f2fs.h    |  1 +
> >>>>>     fs/f2fs/segment.c |  9 ++++-----
> >>>>>     fs/f2fs/sysfs.c   | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> >>>>>     3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> >>>>> index 1974b6a..e441d2d 100644
> >>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> >>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> >>>>> @@ -3694,6 +3694,7 @@ void f2fs_clear_prefree_segments(struct 
> >>>>> f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >>>>>     int f2fs_init_inmem_curseg(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi);
> >>>>>     void f2fs_save_inmem_curseg(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi);
> >>>>>     void f2fs_restore_inmem_curseg(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi);
> >>>>> +int f2fs_init_atgc_curseg(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi);
> >>>>>     int f2fs_allocate_segment_for_resize(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int 
> >>>>> type,
> >>>>>                                         unsigned int start, unsigned 
> >>>>> int end);
> >>>>>     int f2fs_allocate_new_section(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type, 
> >>>>> bool force);
> >>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> >>>>> index 71dc8042..44923d4 100644
> >>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> >>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> >>>>> @@ -2931,14 +2931,11 @@ static int get_atssr_segment(struct 
> >>>>> f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type,
> >>>>>         return ret;
> >>>>>     }
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -static int __f2fs_init_atgc_curseg(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >>>>> +int f2fs_init_atgc_curseg(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >>>>>     {
> >>>>>         struct curseg_info *curseg = CURSEG_I(sbi, 
> >>>>> CURSEG_ALL_DATA_ATGC);
> >>>>>         int ret = 0;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -     if (!sbi->am.atgc_enabled)
> >>>>> -             return 0;
> >>>>> -
> >>>>>         f2fs_down_read(&SM_I(sbi)->curseg_lock);
> >>>>>
> >>>>>         mutex_lock(&curseg->curseg_mutex);
> >>>>> @@ -2955,7 +2952,9 @@ static int __f2fs_init_atgc_curseg(struct 
> >>>>> f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >>>>>     }
> >>>>>     int f2fs_init_inmem_curseg(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >>>>>     {
> >>>>> -     return __f2fs_init_atgc_curseg(sbi);
> >>>>> +     if (!sbi->am.atgc_enabled)
> >>>>> +             return 0;
> >>>>> +     return f2fs_init_atgc_curseg(sbi);
> >>>>>     }
> >>>>>
> >>>>>     static void __f2fs_save_inmem_curseg(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int 
> >>>>> type)
> >>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
> >>>>> index 09d3ecf..72676c5 100644
> >>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
> >>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
> >>>>> @@ -673,6 +673,22 @@ static ssize_t __sbi_store(struct f2fs_attr *a,
> >>>>>                 return count;
> >>>>>         }
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +     if (!strcmp(a->attr.name, "atgc_age_threshold")) {
> >>>>> +             if (t < 0)
> >>>>> +                     return -EINVAL;
> >>>>> +             sbi->am.age_threshold = t;
> >>>>> +             if (sbi->am.atgc_enabled)
> >>>>> +                     return count;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +             if (test_opt(sbi, ATGC) &&
> >>>>> +                     le64_to_cpu(sbi->ckpt->elapsed_time) >= t) {
> >>>>
> >>> Hi Chao,
> >>>> Oh, I guess you want to fix this:
> >>> Yes,  Sorry for not making it clear before.
> >>>>
> >>>> static void init_atgc_management(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >>>> {
> >>>> ...
> >>>>           if (test_opt(sbi, ATGC) &&
> >>>>                   SIT_I(sbi)->elapsed_time >= 
> >>>> DEF_GC_THREAD_AGE_THRESHOLD)
> >>>>                   am->atgc_enabled = true;
> >>>>
> >>>> What about enabling atgc_enabled during checkpoint once elapsed time is
> >>>> satisfed w/ the condition? I guess this can give another chance whenever
> >>>> CP is been triggered, and it can avoid the racing condition as well.
> >>> 1. I'm not sure if this will increase checkpoint time consumption?
> >>
> >> Since it won't increase any IO time, I guess it's fine tolerate time 
> >> consumed
> >> by initialization of atgc curseg.
> >>
> >>> 2. dynamically enabling atgc may have other problems. Is this confirmed?
> >>
> >> I think so, checkpoint has avoided most race cases.
> >>
> >> So, how do you think of below diff:
> > Hi Chao,
> >   I think flow is ok,  some details need to be discussed.
> >>
> >> ---
> >>    fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c |  2 ++
> >>    fs/f2fs/f2fs.h       |  1 +
> >>    fs/f2fs/segment.c    | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >>    3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> >> index 55d444bec5c0..4a73bd481a25 100644
> >> --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> >> @@ -1718,6 +1718,8 @@ int f2fs_write_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, 
> >> struct cp_control *cpc)
> >>          }
> >>
> >>          f2fs_restore_inmem_curseg(sbi);
> >> +       f2fs_reinit_atgc_curseg(sbi);
> >> +
> >>          stat_inc_cp_count(sbi);
> >>    stop:
> >>          unblock_operations(sbi);
> >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> >> index 9688df332147..8d385a1c75ad 100644
> >> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> >> @@ -3693,6 +3693,7 @@ void f2fs_release_discard_addrs(struct f2fs_sb_info 
> >> *sbi);
> >>    int f2fs_npages_for_summary_flush(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool 
> >> for_ra);
> >>    bool f2fs_segment_has_free_slot(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int segno);
> >>    int f2fs_init_inmem_curseg(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi);
> >> +int f2fs_reinit_atgc_curseg(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi);
> >>    void f2fs_save_inmem_curseg(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi);
> >>    void f2fs_restore_inmem_curseg(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi);
> >>    int f2fs_allocate_segment_for_resize(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type,
> >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> >> index bdc2247387e8..6d4273faf061 100644
> >> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> >> @@ -2949,12 +2949,12 @@ static int get_atssr_segment(struct f2fs_sb_info 
> >> *sbi, int type,
> >>          return ret;
> >>    }
> >>
> >> -static int __f2fs_init_atgc_curseg(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >> +static int __f2fs_init_atgc_curseg(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool force)
> >>    {
> >>          struct curseg_info *curseg = CURSEG_I(sbi, CURSEG_ALL_DATA_ATGC);
> >>          int ret = 0;
> >>
> >> -       if (!sbi->am.atgc_enabled)
> >> +       if (!sbi->am.atgc_enabled && !force)
> > Is this parameter  "force" unnecessary?
> > in mount flow, even atgc enable conditions are all met, it is not
> > enabled because of force=false.
> > Or am I missing something?
> >>                  return 0;
> >>
> >>          f2fs_down_read(&SM_I(sbi)->curseg_lock);
> >> @@ -2971,9 +2971,29 @@ static int __f2fs_init_atgc_curseg(struct 
> >> f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >>          f2fs_up_read(&SM_I(sbi)->curseg_lock);
> >>          return ret;
> >>    }
> >> +
> >>    int f2fs_init_inmem_curseg(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >>    {
> >> -       return __f2fs_init_atgc_curseg(sbi);
> >> +       return __f2fs_init_atgc_curseg(sbi, false);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +int f2fs_reinit_atgc_curseg(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >> +{
> >> +       int ret;
> >> +
> >> +       if (!test_opt(sbi, ATGC))
> >> +               return 0;
> >> +       if (sbi->am.atgc_enabled)
> >> +               return 0;
> >> +       if (SIT_I(sbi)->elapsed_time < sbi->am.age_threshold)
> > SIT(sbi)->elapsed_time is just updated in mount flow, so
> > ckpt->elapsed_time is  more suitable here?
>
> Agreed, it needs to be fixed.
>
> Can you please update those changes into v2?
Hi Chao,
OK, and I will also verify the basic function.
thanks!
>
> Thanks,
>
> > thanks!
> >> +               return 0;
> >> +
> >> +       ret = __f2fs_init_atgc_curseg(sbi, true);
> >> +       if (!ret) {
> >> +               sbi->am.atgc_enabled = true;
> >> +               f2fs_info(sbi, "reenabled age threshold GC");
> >> +       }
> >> +       return ret;
> >>    }
> >>
> >>    static void __f2fs_save_inmem_curseg(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type)
> >> --
> >> 2.40.1
> >>
> >>> thanks!
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>>> +                     if (f2fs_init_atgc_curseg(sbi))
> >>>>> +                             return -EINVAL;
> >>>>> +                     sbi->am.atgc_enabled = true;
> >>>>> +             }
> >>>>> +             return count;
> >>>>> +     }
> >>>>> +
> >>>>>         if (!strcmp(a->attr.name, "gc_segment_mode")) {
> >>>>>                 if (t < MAX_GC_MODE)
> >>>>>                         sbi->gc_segment_mode = t;


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to