On 6/4/24 22:17, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> Eugen Hristev <eugen.hris...@collabora.com> writes:
> 
>> From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <kris...@collabora.com>
>>
>> Instead of reimplementing ext4_match_ci, use the new libfs helper.
>>
>> It also adds a comment explaining why fname->cf_name.name must be
>> checked prior to the encryption hash optimization, because that tripped
>> me before.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <kris...@collabora.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hris...@collabora.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers <ebigg...@google.com>
>> ---
>>  fs/ext4/namei.c | 91 +++++++++++++++----------------------------------
>>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/namei.c b/fs/ext4/namei.c
>> index ec4c9bfc1057..20668741a23c 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext4/namei.c
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/namei.c
>> @@ -1390,58 +1390,6 @@ static void dx_insert_block(struct dx_frame *frame, 
>> u32 hash, ext4_lblk_t block)
>>  }
>>  
>>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_UNICODE)
>> -/*
>> - * Test whether a case-insensitive directory entry matches the filename
>> - * being searched for.  If quick is set, assume the name being looked up
>> - * is already in the casefolded form.
>> - *
>> - * Returns: 0 if the directory entry matches, more than 0 if it
>> - * doesn't match or less than zero on error.
>> - */
>> -static int ext4_ci_compare(const struct inode *parent, const struct qstr 
>> *name,
>> -                       u8 *de_name, size_t de_name_len, bool quick)
>> -{
>> -    const struct super_block *sb = parent->i_sb;
>> -    const struct unicode_map *um = sb->s_encoding;
>> -    struct fscrypt_str decrypted_name = FSTR_INIT(NULL, de_name_len);
>> -    struct qstr entry = QSTR_INIT(de_name, de_name_len);
>> -    int ret;
>> -
>> -    if (IS_ENCRYPTED(parent)) {
>> -            const struct fscrypt_str encrypted_name =
>> -                            FSTR_INIT(de_name, de_name_len);
>> -
>> -            decrypted_name.name = kmalloc(de_name_len, GFP_KERNEL);
>> -            if (!decrypted_name.name)
>> -                    return -ENOMEM;
>> -            ret = fscrypt_fname_disk_to_usr(parent, 0, 0, &encrypted_name,
>> -                                            &decrypted_name);
>> -            if (ret < 0)
>> -                    goto out;
>> -            entry.name = decrypted_name.name;
>> -            entry.len = decrypted_name.len;
>> -    }
>> -
>> -    if (quick)
>> -            ret = utf8_strncasecmp_folded(um, name, &entry);
>> -    else
>> -            ret = utf8_strncasecmp(um, name, &entry);
>> -    if (ret < 0) {
>> -            /* Handle invalid character sequence as either an error
>> -             * or as an opaque byte sequence.
>> -             */
>> -            if (sb_has_strict_encoding(sb))
>> -                    ret = -EINVAL;
>> -            else if (name->len != entry.len)
>> -                    ret = 1;
>> -            else
>> -                    ret = !!memcmp(name->name, entry.name, entry.len);
>> -    }
>> -out:
>> -    kfree(decrypted_name.name);
>> -    return ret;
>> -}
>> -
>>  int ext4_fname_setup_ci_filename(struct inode *dir, const struct qstr 
>> *iname,
>>                                struct ext4_filename *name)
>>  {
>> @@ -1503,20 +1451,35 @@ static bool ext4_match(struct inode *parent,
>>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_UNICODE)
>>      if (IS_CASEFOLDED(parent) &&
>>          (!IS_ENCRYPTED(parent) || fscrypt_has_encryption_key(parent))) {
>> -            if (fname->cf_name.name) {
>> -                    if (IS_ENCRYPTED(parent)) {
>> -                            if (fname->hinfo.hash != EXT4_DIRENT_HASH(de) ||
>> -                                    fname->hinfo.minor_hash !=
>> -                                            EXT4_DIRENT_MINOR_HASH(de)) {
>> +            int ret;
>>  
>> -                                    return false;
>> -                            }
>> -                    }
>> -                    return !ext4_ci_compare(parent, &fname->cf_name,
>> -                                            de->name, de->name_len, true);
>> +            /*
>> +             * Just checking IS_ENCRYPTED(parent) below is not
>> +             * sufficient to decide whether one can use the hash for
>> +             * skipping the string comparison, because the key might
>> +             * have been added right after
>> +             * ext4_fname_setup_ci_filename().  In this case, a hash
>> +             * mismatch will be a false negative.  Therefore, make
>> +             * sure cf_name was properly initialized before
>> +             * considering the calculated hash.
>> +             */
>> +            if (IS_ENCRYPTED(parent) && fname->cf_name.name &&
>> +                (fname->hinfo.hash != EXT4_DIRENT_HASH(de) ||
>> +                 fname->hinfo.minor_hash != EXT4_DIRENT_MINOR_HASH(de)))
>> +                    return false;
>> +
>> +            ret = generic_ci_match(parent, fname->usr_fname,
>> +                                   &fname->cf_name, de->name,
>> +                                   de->name_len);
>> +            if (ret < 0) {
>> +                    /*
>> +                     * Treat comparison errors as not a match.  The
>> +                     * only case where it happens is on a disk
>> +                     * corruption or ENOMEM.
>> +                     */
>> +                    return false;
>>              }
>> -            return !ext4_ci_compare(parent, fname->usr_fname, de->name,
>> -                                            de->name_len, false);
> 
> With the changes to patch 3 in this iteration, This could become:
> 
> /*
>  * Treat comparison errors as not a match.  The
>  * only case where it happens is disk corruption
>  * or ENOMEM.
>  */
> return ext4_ci_compare(parent, fname->usr_fname, de->name,
>                      de->name_len, false) > 0;
> 

Do you mean

return generic_ci_match(parent, fname->usr_fname,
                       &fname->cf_name, de->name,
                       de->name_len) > 0;

?

Because ext4_ci_compare was obsoleted with this series.

Thanks,
Eugen


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to