On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 03:50:51PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 09:37:00AM +0800, Li Zetao wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > In btrfs, because there are some interfaces that do not use folio, > > there is page-folio-page mutual conversion. This patch set should > > clean up folio-page conversion as much as possible and use folio > > directly to reduce invalid conversions. > > > > This patch set starts with the rectification of function parameters, > > using folio as parameters directly. And some of those functions have > > already been converted to folio internally, so this part has little > > impact. > > > > I have tested with fsstress more than 10 hours, and no problems were > > found. For the convenience of reviewing, I try my best to only modify > > a single interface in each patch. > > > > Josef also worked on converting pages to folios, and this patch set was > > inspired by him: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1722022376.git.jo...@toxicpanda.com/ > > > > This looks good, I'm running it through the CI. If that comes out clean then > I'll put my reviewed-by on it and push it to our for-next branch. The CI run > can be seen here > > https://github.com/btrfs/linux/actions/runs/10531503734 >
Looks like the compression stuff panic'ed, the run has to finish before it collects the dmesg so IDK where it failed yet, but I'd go over the compression stuff again to see if you can spot it. When the whole run finishes there will be test artifacts you can get to. If you don't have permissions (I honestly don't know how the artifacts permission stuff works) then no worries, I'll grab it in the morning and send you the test and dmesg of what fell over. Thanks, Josef _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
