On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 09:50:41AM +0000, Huang Jianan via Linux-f2fs-devel wrote: > On 2024/9/3 16:54, Wu Bo via Linux-f2fs-devel wrote: > > [外部邮件] 此邮件来源于小米公司外部，请谨慎处理。若对邮件安全性存疑，请将邮件转发给mi...@xiaomi.com进行反馈 > > > > Set inline tail flag to enable this feature when new inode is created. > > Inherit the conditions from inline data. > > > > Signed-off-by: Wu Bo <bo...@vivo.com> > > --- > > fs/f2fs/namei.c | 3 +++ > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/namei.c b/fs/f2fs/namei.c > > index 38b4750475db..13c295ea19de 100644 > > --- a/fs/f2fs/namei.c > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/namei.c > > @@ -315,6 +315,9 @@ static struct inode *f2fs_new_inode(struct mnt_idmap > > *idmap, > > /* Should enable inline_data after compression set */ > > if (test_opt(sbi, INLINE_DATA) && f2fs_may_inline_data(inode)) > > set_inode_flag(inode, FI_INLINE_DATA); > > + /* Inherit the conditions from inline data */ > > + if (test_opt(sbi, INLINE_TAIL) && f2fs_has_inline_data(inode)) > > + set_inode_flag(inode, FI_INLINE_TAIL); > > Should f2fs_post_read_required() be checked here, like inline data?
To ensure the conditions for enabling inline tail are the same as for inline data, I deliberately use the inline data flag to determine whether to enable the inline tail. Thanks > > Thanks, > Jianan > > > > > if (name && !test_opt(sbi, DISABLE_EXT_IDENTIFY)) > > set_file_temperature(sbi, inode, name); > > -- > > 2.35.3 > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list > > Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list > Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
