#syz invalid Becuase commit "f2fs: atomic: fix to not allow GC to pollute atomic_file" has been dropped from linux-next git repo.
On 2024/8/16 17:16, syzbot wrote:
Hello, syzbot found the following issue on: HEAD commit: 9e6869691724 Add linux-next specific files for 20240812 git tree: linux-next console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1203caf3980000 kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=61ba6f3b22ee5467 dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=9aff3b6811f0a00daffa compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40 Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet. Downloadable assets: disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/f1b086192f50/disk-9e686969.raw.xz vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/b457920fb52e/vmlinux-9e686969.xz kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/e63ba9cce98a/bzImage-9e686969.xz IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit: Reported-by: syzbot+9aff3b6811f0a00da...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com F2FS-fs (loop0): Try to recover 1th superblock, ret: 0 F2FS-fs (loop0): Mounted with checkpoint version = 48b305e5 syz.0.98: attempt to access beyond end of device loop0: rw=2049, sector=45096, nr_sectors = 8 limit=40427 ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.11.0-rc3-next-20240812-syzkaller #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz.0.98/5917 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88807896ad30 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#26){++++}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:799 [inline] ffff88807896ad30 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#26){++++}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_release_file+0x9b/0x100 fs/f2fs/file.c:1940 but task is already holding lock: ffff88807896b308 (&fi->i_gc_rwsem[WRITE]){++++}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2196 [inline] ffff88807896b308 (&fi->i_gc_rwsem[WRITE]){++++}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_commit_atomic_write+0x105/0x1510 fs/f2fs/segment.c:388 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&fi->i_gc_rwsem[WRITE]){++++}-{3:3}: lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5762 down_write+0x99/0x220 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1579 f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2196 [inline] f2fs_setattr+0xb80/0x12d0 fs/f2fs/file.c:1060 notify_change+0xb9d/0xe70 fs/attr.c:535 do_truncate+0x220/0x310 fs/open.c:65 handle_truncate fs/namei.c:3395 [inline] do_open fs/namei.c:3745 [inline] path_openat+0x2ced/0x3470 fs/namei.c:3900 do_filp_open+0x235/0x490 fs/namei.c:3927 do_sys_openat2+0x13e/0x1d0 fs/open.c:1416 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1431 [inline] __do_sys_creat fs/open.c:1507 [inline] __se_sys_creat fs/open.c:1501 [inline] __x64_sys_creat+0x123/0x170 fs/open.c:1501 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f -> #0 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#26){++++}-{3:3}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3136 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3255 [inline] validate_chain+0x18e0/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3871 __lock_acquire+0x137a/0x2040 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5145 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5762 down_write+0x99/0x220 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1579 inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:799 [inline] f2fs_release_file+0x9b/0x100 fs/f2fs/file.c:1940 __fput+0x24a/0x8a0 fs/file_table.c:425 task_work_run+0x24f/0x310 kernel/task_work.c:228 get_signal+0x16ad/0x1810 kernel/signal.c:2690 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x96/0x830 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:337 exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:111 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:328 [inline] __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0xc9/0x370 kernel/entry/common.c:218 do_syscall_64+0x100/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:89 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&fi->i_gc_rwsem[WRITE]); lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#26); lock(&fi->i_gc_rwsem[WRITE]); lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#26); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by syz.0.98/5917: #0: ffff88807896b308 (&fi->i_gc_rwsem[WRITE]){++++}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2196 [inline] #0: ffff88807896b308 (&fi->i_gc_rwsem[WRITE]){++++}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_commit_atomic_write+0x105/0x1510 fs/f2fs/segment.c:388 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5917 Comm: syz.0.98 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc3-next-20240812-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 06/27/2024 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120 check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2189 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3136 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3255 [inline] validate_chain+0x18e0/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3871 __lock_acquire+0x137a/0x2040 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5145 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5762 down_write+0x99/0x220 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1579 inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:799 [inline] f2fs_release_file+0x9b/0x100 fs/f2fs/file.c:1940 __fput+0x24a/0x8a0 fs/file_table.c:425 task_work_run+0x24f/0x310 kernel/task_work.c:228 get_signal+0x16ad/0x1810 kernel/signal.c:2690 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x96/0x830 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:337 exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:111 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:328 [inline] __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0xc9/0x370 kernel/entry/common.c:218 do_syscall_64+0x100/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:89 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f1c8c1779f9 Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007f1c8d01f038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: fffffffffffffffb RBX: 00007f1c8c305f80 RCX: 00007f1c8c1779f9 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000f502 RDI: 0000000000000004 RBP: 00007f1c8c1e58ee R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007f1c8c305f80 R15: 00007ffdbf6238f8 </TASK> --- This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors. See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot. syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkal...@googlegroups.com. syzbot will keep track of this issue. See: https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot. If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with: #syz fix: exact-commit-title If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with: #syz set subsystems: new-subsystem (See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard) If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with: #syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report If you want to undo deduplication, reply with: #syz undup _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
_______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
