> > If the device (or file system, which really needs to be in control
> > for actual files vs just block devices) does not support all 256
> > we need to reduce them to less than that. The kernel can help with
> > that a bit if the streams have meanings (collapsing temperature levels
> > that are close), but not at all if they don't have meanings.
>
> Current patch (nvme) does what you mentioned above.
> Pasting the fragment that maps potentially large placement-hints to the
> last valid placement-id.
>
> +static inline void nvme_assign_placement_id(struct nvme_ns *ns,
> + struct request *req,
> + struct nvme_command *cmd)
> +{
> + u8 h = umin(ns->head->nr_plids - 1,
> + WRITE_PLACEMENT_HINT(req->write_hint));
> +
> + cmd->rw.control |= cpu_to_le16(NVME_RW_DTYPE_DPLCMT);
> + cmd->rw.dsmgmt |= cpu_to_le32(ns->head->plids[h] << 16);
> +}
>
> But this was just an implementation choice (and not a failure avoidance
> fallback).
And it completely fucks thing up as I said. If I have an application
that wants to separate streams I need to know how many stream I
have available, and not fold all higher numbers into the last one
available.
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
