#syz fix: f2fs: fix to avoid potential deadlock in f2fs_record_stop_reason()

On 2024/10/8 14:51, syzbot wrote:
Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit:    3840cbe24cf0 sched: psi: fix bogus pressure spikes from ag..
git tree:       upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=10bbab9f980000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=f95955e3f7b5790c
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=7988d9999219aea9f2db
compiler:       Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 
2.40
syz repro:      https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=17a4b3d0580000

Downloadable assets:
disk image (non-bootable): 
https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/7feb34a89c2a/non_bootable_disk-3840cbe2.raw.xz
vmlinux: 
https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/55888d19e055/vmlinux-3840cbe2.xz
kernel image: 
https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/f6b8ca10a019/bzImage-3840cbe2.xz
mounted in repro #1: 
https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/1ebfe9150f9d/mount_0.gz
mounted in repro #2: 
https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/91e39079514c/mount_7.gz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+7988d9999219aea9f...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.12.0-rc1-syzkaller-00114-g3840cbe24cf0 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kswapd0/79 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888057a62610 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: f2fs_evict_inode+0x662/0x15c0 
fs/f2fs/inode.c:842

but task is already holding lock:
ffffffff8ea37160 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6844 
[inline]
ffffffff8ea37160 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: kswapd+0xbf1/0x3700 
mm/vmscan.c:7226

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #2 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
        lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
        __fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:3834 [inline]
        fs_reclaim_acquire+0x88/0x140 mm/page_alloc.c:3848
        might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:327 [inline]
        prepare_alloc_pages+0x147/0x5d0 mm/page_alloc.c:4493
        __alloc_pages_noprof+0x166/0x6c0 mm/page_alloc.c:4722
        alloc_pages_mpol_noprof+0x3e8/0x680 mm/mempolicy.c:2265
        alloc_pages_noprof mm/mempolicy.c:2345 [inline]
        folio_alloc_noprof+0x128/0x180 mm/mempolicy.c:2352
        filemap_alloc_folio_noprof+0xdf/0x500 mm/filemap.c:1010
        do_read_cache_folio+0x2eb/0x850 mm/filemap.c:3787
        read_mapping_folio include/linux/pagemap.h:1011 [inline]
        f2fs_commit_super+0x52b/0x7d0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4044
        f2fs_record_stop_reason+0x13b/0x1d0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4079
        f2fs_handle_critical_error+0x2ac/0x5c0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4174
        f2fs_write_inode+0x35f/0x4d0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:785
        f2fs_do_sync_file+0x1395/0x19f0 fs/f2fs/file.c:356
        f2fs_ioc_commit_atomic_write fs/f2fs/file.c:2259 [inline]
        __f2fs_ioctl+0x49db/0xb8f0 fs/f2fs/file.c:4417
        vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
        __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:907 [inline]
        __se_sys_ioctl+0xf9/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:893
        do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
        do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #1 (&sbi->sb_lock){++++}-{3:3}:
        lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
        down_write+0x99/0x220 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1577
        f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2199 [inline]
        f2fs_record_errors fs/f2fs/super.c:4121 [inline]
        f2fs_handle_error+0xf6/0x250 fs/f2fs/super.c:4138
        __get_node_page+0x8d0/0xfc0 fs/f2fs/node.c:1489
        f2fs_update_inode_page+0x87/0x170 fs/f2fs/inode.c:746
        f2fs_evict_inode+0xa61/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:883
        evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:723
        do_unlinkat+0x512/0x830 fs/namei.c:4540
        __do_sys_unlink fs/namei.c:4581 [inline]
        __se_sys_unlink fs/namei.c:4579 [inline]
        __x64_sys_unlink+0x47/0x50 fs/namei.c:4579
        do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
        do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}:
        check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
        check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
        validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
        __lock_acquire+0x1384/0x2050 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5202
        lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
        percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
        __sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1716 [inline]
        sb_start_intwrite+0x4d/0x1c0 include/linux/fs.h:1899
        f2fs_evict_inode+0x662/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:842
        evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:723
        f2fs_evict_inode+0x1a4/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:807
        evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:723
        dispose_list fs/inode.c:772 [inline]
        prune_icache_sb+0x239/0x2f0 fs/inode.c:961
        super_cache_scan+0x38c/0x4b0 fs/super.c:223
        do_shrink_slab+0x701/0x1160 mm/shrinker.c:435
        shrink_slab_memcg mm/shrinker.c:548 [inline]
        shrink_slab+0x878/0x14d0 mm/shrinker.c:626
        shrink_one+0x43b/0x850 mm/vmscan.c:4818
        shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4879 [inline]
        lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:4957 [inline]
        shrink_node+0x3799/0x3de0 mm/vmscan.c:5937
        kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6765 [inline]
        balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6957 [inline]
        kswapd+0x1ca3/0x3700 mm/vmscan.c:7226
        kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389
        ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
   sb_internal#2 --> &sbi->sb_lock --> fs_reclaim

  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0                    CPU1
        ----                    ----
   lock(fs_reclaim);
                                lock(&sbi->sb_lock);
                                lock(fs_reclaim);
   rlock(sb_internal#2);

  *** DEADLOCK ***

2 locks held by kswapd0/79:
  #0: ffffffff8ea37160 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat 
mm/vmscan.c:6844 [inline]
  #0: ffffffff8ea37160 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: kswapd+0xbf1/0x3700 
mm/vmscan.c:7226
  #1: ffff888057a620e0 (&type->s_umount_key#54){++++}-{3:3}, at: 
super_trylock_shared fs/super.c:562 [inline]
  #1: ffff888057a620e0 (&type->s_umount_key#54){++++}-{3:3}, at: 
super_cache_scan+0x94/0x4b0 fs/super.c:196

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 79 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 
6.12.0-rc1-syzkaller-00114-g3840cbe24cf0 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 
1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
  <TASK>
  __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
  dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120
  print_circular_bug+0x13a/0x1b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2074
  check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2206
  check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
  check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
  validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
  __lock_acquire+0x1384/0x2050 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5202
  lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
  percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
  __sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1716 [inline]
  sb_start_intwrite+0x4d/0x1c0 include/linux/fs.h:1899
  f2fs_evict_inode+0x662/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:842
  evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:723
  f2fs_evict_inode+0x1a4/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:807
  evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:723
  dispose_list fs/inode.c:772 [inline]
  prune_icache_sb+0x239/0x2f0 fs/inode.c:961
  super_cache_scan+0x38c/0x4b0 fs/super.c:223
  do_shrink_slab+0x701/0x1160 mm/shrinker.c:435
  shrink_slab_memcg mm/shrinker.c:548 [inline]
  shrink_slab+0x878/0x14d0 mm/shrinker.c:626
  shrink_one+0x43b/0x850 mm/vmscan.c:4818
  shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4879 [inline]
  lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:4957 [inline]
  shrink_node+0x3799/0x3de0 mm/vmscan.c:5937
  kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6765 [inline]
  balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6957 [inline]
  kswapd+0x1ca3/0x3700 mm/vmscan.c:7226
  kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389
  ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244
  </TASK>


---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkal...@googlegroups.com.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title

If you want syzbot to run the reproducer, reply with:
#syz test: git://repo/address.git branch-or-commit-hash
If you attach or paste a git patch, syzbot will apply it before testing.

If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)

If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report

If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup



_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to