On 2024/11/22 13:23, Zhiguo Niu wrote:
Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> 于2024年11月21日周四 10:01写道：Quoted: "at this time, there are still 1086911 extent nodes in this zombie extent tree that need to be cleaned up. crash_arm64_sprd_v8.0.3++> extent_tree.node_cnt ffffff80896cc500 node_cnt = { counter = 1086911 }, " As reported by Xiuhong, there will be a huge number of extent nodes in extent tree, it may potentially cause: - slab memory fragments - extreme long time shrink on extent tree - low mapping efficiency Let's add a sysfs node to limit max read extent count for each inode, by default, value of this threshold is 10240, it can be updated according to user's requirement. Reported-by: Xiuhong Wang <xiuhong.w...@unisoc.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/20241112110627.1314632-1-xiuhong.w...@unisoc.com/ Signed-off-by: Xiuhong Wang <xiuhong.w...@unisoc.com> Signed-off-by: Zhiguo Niu <zhiguo....@unisoc.com> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <c...@kernel.org> --- Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs | 6 ++++++ fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 5 ++++- fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 4 ++++ fs/f2fs/sysfs.c | 7 +++++++ 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs index 513296bb6f29..3e1630c70d8a 100644 --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs @@ -822,3 +822,9 @@ Description: It controls the valid block ratio threshold not to trigger excessiv for zoned deivces. The initial value of it is 95(%). F2FS will stop the background GC thread from intiating GC for sections having valid blocks exceeding the ratio. + +What: /sys/fs/f2fs/<disk>/max_read_extent_count +Date: November 2024 +Contact: "Chao Yu" <c...@kernel.org> +Description: It controls max read extent count for per-inode, the value of threshold + is 10240 by default. diff --git a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c index b7a6817b44b0..347b3b647834 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c @@ -717,7 +717,9 @@ static void __update_extent_tree_range(struct inode *inode, } if (end < org_end && (type != EX_READ || - org_end - end >= F2FS_MIN_EXTENT_LEN)) { + (org_end - end >= F2FS_MIN_EXTENT_LEN && + atomic_read(&et->node_cnt) < + sbi->max_read_extent_count))) { if (parts) { __set_extent_info(&ei, end, org_end - end, @@ -1212,6 +1214,7 @@ void f2fs_init_extent_cache_info(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) sbi->hot_data_age_threshold = DEF_HOT_DATA_AGE_THRESHOLD; sbi->warm_data_age_threshold = DEF_WARM_DATA_AGE_THRESHOLD; sbi->last_age_weight = LAST_AGE_WEIGHT; + sbi->max_read_extent_count = DEF_MAX_READ_EXTENT_COUNT; } int __init f2fs_create_extent_cache(void) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h index b65b023a588a..6f2cbf4c5740 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h @@ -635,6 +635,9 @@ enum { #define DEF_HOT_DATA_AGE_THRESHOLD 262144 #define DEF_WARM_DATA_AGE_THRESHOLD 2621440 +/* default max read extent count per inode */ +#define DEF_MAX_READ_EXTENT_COUNT 10240 + /* extent cache type */ enum extent_type { EX_READ, @@ -1619,6 +1622,7 @@ struct f2fs_sb_info { /* for extent tree cache */ struct extent_tree_info extent_tree[NR_EXTENT_CACHES]; atomic64_t allocated_data_blocks; /* for block age extent_cache */ + unsigned int max_read_extent_count; /* max read extent count per inode */ /* The threshold used for hot and warm data seperation*/ unsigned int hot_data_age_threshold; diff --git a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c index bdbf24db667b..d1356c656cac 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c @@ -787,6 +787,13 @@ static ssize_t __sbi_store(struct f2fs_attr *a, return count; } + if (!strcmp(a->attr.name, "max_read_extent_count")) { + if (t > UINT_MAX) + return -EINVAL; + *ui = (unsigned int)t; + return count; + } +Hi Chao, from Xiuhong remider, it seems miss codes of adding sysfs node "max_read_extent_count"? F2FS_SBI_GENERAL_RW_ATTR(max_read_extent_count); ATTR_LIST(max_read_extent_count);
Oops, let me fix this soon. Thanks,
thanks！if (!strcmp(a->attr.name, "ipu_policy")) { if (t >= BIT(F2FS_IPU_MAX)) return -EINVAL; -- 2.40.1 _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
_______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
