>On 2024/12/4 20:23, wangzijie wrote:
>> When we check inode which just has inline xattr data, we copy
>> inline xattr data from inode, check it(maybe fix it) and copy
>> it again to inode. We can check and fix xattr inplace for this
>> kind of inode to reduce memcpy times.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: wangzijie <wangzij...@honor.com>
>> ---
>>   fsck/fsck.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
>>   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/fsck/fsck.c b/fsck/fsck.c
>> index aa3fb97..fd8b082 100644
>> --- a/fsck/fsck.c
>> +++ b/fsck/fsck.c
>> @@ -840,11 +840,18 @@ int chk_extended_attributes(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, 
>> u32 nid,
>>      struct f2fs_xattr_entry *ent;
>>      __u32 xattr_size = XATTR_SIZE(&inode->i);
>>      bool need_fix = false;
>> +    bool has_xattr_node = false;
>> +    nid_t xnid = le32_to_cpu(inode->i.i_xattr_nid);
>>   
>>      if (xattr_size == 0)
>>              return 0;
>>   
>> -    xattr = read_all_xattrs(sbi, inode, false);
>> +    if (xattr_size <= inline_xattr_size(&inode->i) && !xnid)
>Hi, zijie,
>
>I propose to change the behavors of read_all_xattrs and write_all_xattrs, and 
>to add a
>new free_xattrs.
>
>* read_all_xattrs checks whether xnid exist. If it's not, return inline_xattr 
>directly
>   without alloc and memcpy.
>* write_all_xattrs checks whether inline_xattr and new txattr_addr have the 
>same address
>   to avoid copying back.
>* free_xattrs checks whether inline_xattr and new txattr_addr have the same 
>address to
>   free xattr buffer properly.
>
>In this way, all instances where {read|write}_all_xattrs are called can avoid 
>unnecessary
>memory alloc and copy. free_xattrs(xattrs) should be used instead of 
>free(xattrs).
>
>thanks,
>shengyong

Hi, yong
Thanks for sharing what you proposed to do. By the way, I noticed that 
when setattr, read_all_xattr will set xattr header's magic and refcount,
but it seems we don't check these values in header(kernel/fsck). Should we 
add check logic for it?

>> +            xattr = inline_xattr_addr(&inode->i);
>> +    else {
>> +            xattr = read_all_xattrs(sbi, inode, false);
>> +            has_xattr_node = true;
>> +    }
>>      ASSERT(xattr);
>>   
>>      last_base_addr = (void *)xattr + xattr_size;
>> @@ -867,12 +874,15 @@ int chk_extended_attributes(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, 
>> u32 nid,
>>      }
>>      if (need_fix && c.fix_on) {
>>              memset(ent, 0, (u8 *)last_base_addr - (u8 *)ent);
>> -            write_all_xattrs(sbi, inode, xattr_size, xattr);
>> +            if (has_xattr_node) {
>> +                    write_all_xattrs(sbi, inode, xattr_size, xattr);
>> +                    free(xattr);
>> +            }
>>              FIX_MSG("[0x%x] nullify wrong xattr entries", nid);
>> -            free(xattr);
>>              return 1;
>>      }
>> -    free(xattr);
>> +    if (has_xattr_node)
>> +            free(xattr);
>>      return 0;
>>   }
>>   
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
>Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel



_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to