On 3/7/25 12:02, David Disseldorp wrote:
> Thanks for submitting the new test. It looks good aside from a few minor
> things below...
> 
> On Thu,  6 Mar 2025 16:18:09 +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> 
>> This is a regression test to check whether fsck can handle corrupted
>> nlinks correctly, it uses inject.f2fs to inject nlinks w/ wrong value,
>> and expects fsck.f2fs can detect such corruption and do the repair.
>>
>> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <c...@kernel.org>
>> ---
>>  tests/f2fs/009     | 142 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  tests/f2fs/009.out |   2 +
>>  2 files changed, 144 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100755 tests/f2fs/009
>>  create mode 100644 tests/f2fs/009.out
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/f2fs/009 b/tests/f2fs/009
>> new file mode 100755
>> index 00000000..8f6a3e11
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tests/f2fs/009
>> @@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
>> +#! /bin/bash
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +# Copyright (c) 2025 Chao Yu.  All Rights Reserved.
>> +#
>> +# FS QA Test No. f2fs/009
>> +#
>> +# This is a regression test to check whether fsck can handle corrupted
>> +# nlinks correctly, it uses inject.f2fs to inject nlinks w/ wrong value,
>> +# and expects fsck.f2fs can detect such corruption and do the repair.
>> +#
>> +. ./common/preamble
>> +_begin_fstest auto quick
>> +
>> +_require_scratch
> 
> You should probably check for F2FS_INJECT_PROG and skip if not present.
> Is it dependent on CONFIG_F2FS_FAULT_INJECTION? If so it'd be nice if

It isn't dependent on CONFIG_F2FS_FAULT_INJECTION.

> you could check for that too.
> 
> Flag the fix for the regression via e.g.:
> _fixed_by_git_commit f2fs-tools 958cd6e
> 
>> +
>> +dir=$SCRATCH_MNT
> 
> I think it'd be easier to follow if you dropped this alias and just used
> $SCRATCH_MNT directly.
> 
>> +filename=$dir/foo
>> +hardlink=$dir/bar
>> +
>> +for ((i=0;i<14;i++)) do
>> +    echo "round: " $i >> $seqres.full
>> +
>> +    _scratch_mkfs "-f" >> $seqres.full
>> +    _scratch_mount >> $seqres.full
>> +
>> +    if [ $i == 0 ]; then
>> +            touch $filename
>> +            ino=`stat $filename | awk '/Inode:/ {print $4}'`
> 
> Use "stat -c '%i'" instead of piping into awk. Also, it looks like this
> is called in every round, so just move it after the elifs.
> 
>> +            nlink=0
>> +    elif [ $i == 1 ]; then
>> +            mkdir $filename
>> +            ino=`stat $filename | awk '/Inode:/ {print $4}'`
>> +            nlink=1
>> +    elif [ $i == 2 ]; then
>> +            mknod $filename c 9 0
>> +            ino=`stat $filename | awk '/Inode:/ {print $4}'`
>> +            nlink=0
>> +    elif [ $i == 3 ]; then
>> +            mknod $filename b 8 0
>> +            ino=`stat $filename | awk '/Inode:/ {print $4}'`
>> +            nlink=0
>> +    elif [ $i == 4 ]; then
>> +            mkfifo $filename
>> +            ino=`stat $filename | awk '/Inode:/ {print $4}'`
>> +            nlink=0
>> +    elif [ $i == 5 ]; then
>> +            socket -s $filename >> $seqres.full 2>&1 &
>> +            pid=$!
>> +            sleep 2
>> +            ino=`stat $filename | awk '/Inode:/ {print $4}'`
>> +            kill $pid >> $seqres.full 2>&1
>> +            nlink=0
>> +    elif [ $i == 6 ]; then
>> +            ln -s $dir/empty $filename
>> +            ino=`stat $filename | awk '/Inode:/ {print $4}'`
>> +            nlink=0
>> +    elif [ $i == 7 ]; then
>> +            # orphan inode
>> +            touch $filename
>> +            ino=`stat $filename | awk '/Inode:/ {print $4}'`
>> +            $F2FS_IO_PROG write 1 0 1 zero atomic_commit $filename 5000 >> 
>> $seqres.full 2>&1 &
>> +            stat $filename >> $seqres.full
>> +            rm $filename
>> +            $F2FS_IO_PROG shutdown 1 $dir/ >> $seqres.full
>> +            sleep 6
>> +            nlink=1
>> +    elif [ $i == 8 ]; then
>> +            # hardlink on file
>> +            touch $filename
>> +            ino=`stat $filename | awk '/Inode:/ {print $4}'`
>> +            ln $filename $hardlink
>> +            nlink=0
>> +    elif [ $i == 9 ]; then
>> +            # hardlink on charactor
>> +            mknod $filename c 9 0
>> +            ino=`stat $filename | awk '/Inode:/ {print $4}'`
>> +            ln $filename $hardlink
>> +            nlink=0
>> +    elif [ $i == 10 ]; then
>> +            # hardlink on blockdev
>> +            mknod $filename b 8 0
>> +            ino=`stat $filename | awk '/Inode:/ {print $4}'`
>> +            ln $filename $hardlink
>> +            nlink=0
>> +    elif [ $i == 11 ]; then
>> +            # hardlink on pipe
>> +            mkfifo $filename
>> +            ino=`stat $filename | awk '/Inode:/ {print $4}'`
>> +            ln $filename $hardlink
>> +            nlink=0
>> +    elif [ $i == 12 ]; then
>> +            # hardlink on socket
>> +            socket -s $filename >> $seqres.full 2>&1 &
>> +            pid=$!
>> +            sleep 2
>> +            ino=`stat $filename | awk '/Inode:/ {print $4}'`
>> +            kill $pid >> $seqres.full 2>&1
>> +            ln $filename $hardlink
>> +            nlink=0
>> +    elif [ $i == 13 ]; then
>> +            # hardlink on symlink
>> +            ln -s $dir/empty $filename
>> +            ino=`stat $filename | awk '/Inode:/ {print $4}'`
>> +            ln $filename $hardlink
>> +            nlink=0
>> +    fi
>> +
>> +    if [ $i != 7 ]; then
>> +            stat $dir/* >> $seqres.full
>> +    fi
>> +    echo "ino:"$ino >> $seqres.full
>> +    echo "nlink:"$nlink >> $seqres.full
>> +
>> +    _scratch_unmount
>> +
>> +    $F2FS_INJECT_PROG --node --mb i_links --nid $ino --val $nlink 
>> $SCRATCH_DEV >> $seqres.full
>> +    if [ $? != 0 ]; then
>> +            exit
>> +    fi
> 
> xfstests failures are normally triggered via golden output mismatch
> instead of explicit status checks or _fail calls... Can you filter the
> inject / repair output so that it ends up in the golden output for
> comparison?

I tried to avoid filting inject/repair outputs and compare the output w/
golden output in 009.out, since I'm not sure whether the output will change
or not later in f2fs-tools...

Will fix all others according to your comments, thanks a lot for the comments.

Thanks,

> 
>> +    export FSCK_OPTIONS="-f"
>> +    _repair_scratch_fs >> $seqres.full
>> +    if [ $? != 1 ]; then
>> +            _fail "fsck can not detect and repair zero nlink corruption "$i
>> +            exit
>> +    fi
>> +
>> +    export FSCK_OPTIONS=""
>> +    _check_scratch_fs >> $seqres.full
>> +    if [ $? != 0 ]; then
>> +            _fail "fsck hasn't fixed nlink corruption "$i
>> +            exit
>> +    fi
>> +
>> +    _scratch_mount >> $seqres.full
>> +    _scratch_unmount
>> +done
>> +
>> +echo "Silence is golden"
>> +
>> +status=0
>> +exit
>> diff --git a/tests/f2fs/009.out b/tests/f2fs/009.out
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 00000000..7e977155
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tests/f2fs/009.out
>> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
>> +QA output created by 009
>> +Silence is golden
> 



_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to