Hi Chao Yu,

On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 10:47:31 +0800, Chao Yu wrote:

> This is a regression testcase to check whether we will handle database
> inode dirty status correctly:
> 1. make sure disk quota is enabled
> 2. create a regular file, and write data into the file
> 3. start transaction on the file (via F2FS_IOC_START_ATOMIC_WRITE)
> 4. write transaction data to the file
> 5. commit and end the transaction (via F2FS_IOC_COMMIT_ATOMIC_WRITE)
> 6. meanwhile loop call fsync in parallel
> Before f098aeba04c9 ("f2fs: fix to avoid atomicity corruption of atomic
> file"), database file may become corrupted after atomic write while
> there is concurrent dirty inode flush in background.
> 
> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org>
> Cc: Daeho Jeong <daehoje...@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <c...@kernel.org>
> ---
>  tests/f2fs/013     | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tests/f2fs/013.out |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 75 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100755 tests/f2fs/013
>  create mode 100644 tests/f2fs/013.out
> 
> diff --git a/tests/f2fs/013 b/tests/f2fs/013
> new file mode 100755
> index 00000000..3db8448c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/f2fs/013
> @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +# Copyright (c) 2025 Chao Yu.  All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# FS QA Test No. f2fs/013
> +#
> +# This is a regression testcase to check whether we will handle database
> +# inode dirty status correctly:
> +# 1. make sure disk quota is enabled

Where is the check that disk quota is enabled?

> +# 2. create a regular file, and write data into the file
> +# 3. start transaction on the file (via F2FS_IOC_START_ATOMIC_WRITE)
> +# 4. write transaction data to the file
> +# 5. commit and end the transaction (via F2FS_IOC_COMMIT_ATOMIC_WRITE)
> +# 6. meanwhile loop call fsync in parallel
> +# Before f098aeba04c9 ("f2fs: fix to avoid atomicity corruption of atomic
> +# file"), database file may become corrupted after atomic write while
> +# there is concurrent dirty inode flush in background.
> +#
> +. ./common/preamble
> +_begin_fstest auto quick
> +
> +_cleanup()
> +{
> +     [ -n "$atomic_write_pid" ] && kill -9 $atomic_write_pid
> +     wait
> +     cd /
> +     rm -r -f $tmp.*
> +}
> +
> +_fixed_by_kernel_commit f098aeba04c9 \
> +     "f2fs: fix to avoid atomicity corruption of atomic file"
> +
> +_require_scratch
> +
> +_scratch_mkfs >> $seqres.full
> +# note that it relis on FAULT_TIMEOUT fault injection support in f2fs
> +_scratch_mount "-o fault_injection=1,fault_type=4194304" >> $seqres.full

This requires CONFIG_F2FS_FAULT_INJECTION=y, although now I see that
parse_options() just ignores them and the test still passes fine with
CONFIG_F2FS_FAULT_INJECTION unset. Does it make sense to run without
FAULT_TIMEOUT injection? It'd likely make sense to just _notrun if fault
injection is unavailable.

> +dbfile=$SCRATCH_MNT/file.db
> +
> +# initialize database file
> +$XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite 0 4k" -c "fsync" -f $dbfile >> $seqres.full
> +
> +# sync filesystem to clear dirty inode
> +sync
> +
> +# start atomic_write on src.db database file and commit transaction
> +$F2FS_IO_PROG write 1 0 2 zero atomic_commit $dbfile >> $seqres.full &
> +atomic_write_pid=$!
> +
> +# call fsync to flush dirty inode of database file in parallel
> +for ((j=0;j<1000;j++)) do
> +     $F2FS_IO_PROG fsync $dbfile >> $seqres.full
> +done
> +
> +wait $atomic_write_pid
> +unset atomic_write_pid
> +
> +# flush dirty data and drop cache
> +sync
> +echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
> +
> +newsize=`stat $dbfile -c %s`
> +if [ "$newsize" != "8192" ]; then
> +     _fail "filesize is inconsistent:"$newsize
> +fi

nit: I think it'd be simpler to do:
  stat $dbfile -c %s
...and just put the 8192 in the golden output.

> +rm $dbfile
> +sync
> +
> +echo "Silence is golden"
> +
> +status=0
> +exit
> diff --git a/tests/f2fs/013.out b/tests/f2fs/013.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..3e66423b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/f2fs/013.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +QA output created by 013
> +Silence is golden



_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to