On 5/8/25 23:52, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 5/8/25 3:13 AM, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 4/24/25 01:08, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>> From: Hongbo Li <lihongb...@huawei.com>
> 
> ...
> 
>>> +   if (ctx->qname_mask) {
>>> +           for (i = 0; i < MAXQUOTAS; i++) {
>>> +                   if (!(ctx->qname_mask & (1 << i)))
>>> +                           continue;
>>> +
>>> +                   old_qname = F2FS_OPTION(sbi).s_qf_names[i];
>>> +                   new_qname = F2FS_CTX_INFO(ctx).s_qf_names[i];
>>> +                   if (quota_turnon &&
>>> +                           !!old_qname != !!new_qname)
>>> +                           goto err_jquota_change;
>>> +
>>> +                   if (old_qname) {
>>> +                           if (strcmp(old_qname, new_qname) == 0) {
>>> +                                   ctx->qname_mask &= ~(1 << i);
>>
>> Needs to free and nully F2FS_CTX_INFO(ctx).s_qf_names[i]?
>>
> 
> I will have to look into this. If s_qf_names are used/applied, they get
> transferred to the sbi in f2fs_apply_quota_options and are freed in the
> normal course of the fiesystem lifetime, i.e at unmount in f2fs_put_super.
> That's the normal non-error lifecycle of the strings.
> 
> If they do not get transferred to the sbi in f2fs_apply_quota_options, they
> remain on the ctx, and should get freed in f2fs_fc_free:
> 
>         for (i = 0; i < MAXQUOTAS; i++)
>                 kfree(F2FS_CTX_INFO(ctx).s_qf_names[i]);
> 
> It is possible to free them before f2fs_fc_free of course and that might
> be an inconsistency in this function, because we do that in the other case
> in the check_consistency function:
> 
>                         if (quota_feature) {
>                                 f2fs_info(sbi, "QUOTA feature is enabled, so 
> ignore qf_name");
>                                 ctx->qname_mask &= ~(1 << i);
>                                 kfree(F2FS_CTX_INFO(ctx).s_qf_names[i]);
>                                 F2FS_CTX_INFO(ctx).s_qf_names[i] = NULL;
>                         }

Yes, I noticed such inconsistency, and I'm wondering why we handle 
ctx.s_qf_names
w/ different ways.

                        if (quota_feature) {
                                f2fs_info(sbi, "QUOTA feature is enabled, so 
ignore qf_name");
                                ctx->qname_mask &= ~(1 << i);
                                kfree(F2FS_CTX_INFO(ctx).s_qf_names[i]);
                                F2FS_CTX_INFO(ctx).s_qf_names[i] = NULL;
                        }

For "quota_feature is on" case, as opt.s_qf_names is NULL, so if it doesn't
nully ctx.s_qf_names, it will fail below check which is not as expected. So
I doubt it should be handled separately.

        /* Make sure we don't mix old and new quota format */
        usr_qf_name = F2FS_OPTION(sbi).s_qf_names[USRQUOTA] ||
                        F2FS_CTX_INFO(ctx).s_qf_names[USRQUOTA];
        grp_qf_name = F2FS_OPTION(sbi).s_qf_names[GRPQUOTA] ||
                        F2FS_CTX_INFO(ctx).s_qf_names[GRPQUOTA];
        prj_qf_name = F2FS_OPTION(sbi).s_qf_names[PRJQUOTA] ||
                        F2FS_CTX_INFO(ctx).s_qf_names[PRJQUOTA];
        usrquota = test_opt(sbi, USRQUOTA) ||
                        ctx_test_opt(ctx, F2FS_MOUNT_USRQUOTA);
        grpquota = test_opt(sbi, GRPQUOTA) ||
                        ctx_test_opt(ctx, F2FS_MOUNT_GRPQUOTA);
        prjquota = test_opt(sbi, PRJQUOTA) ||
                        ctx_test_opt(ctx, F2FS_MOUNT_PRJQUOTA);

        if (usr_qf_name) {
                ctx_clear_opt(ctx, F2FS_MOUNT_USRQUOTA);
                usrquota = false;
        }
        if (grp_qf_name) {
                ctx_clear_opt(ctx, F2FS_MOUNT_GRPQUOTA);
                grpquota = false;
        }
        if (prj_qf_name) {
                ctx_clear_opt(ctx, F2FS_MOUNT_PRJQUOTA);
                prjquota = false;
        }
        if (usr_qf_name || grp_qf_name || prj_qf_name) {
                if (grpquota || usrquota || prjquota) {
                        f2fs_err(sbi, "old and new quota format mixing");
                        return -EINVAL;
                }
                if (!(ctx->spec_mask & F2FS_SPEC_jqfmt ||
                                F2FS_OPTION(sbi).s_jquota_fmt)) {
                        f2fs_err(sbi, "journaled quota format not specified");
                        return -EINVAL;
                }
        }

> 
> I'll have to look at it a bit more. But this is modeled on ext4's
> ext4_check_quota_consistency(), and it does not do any freeing in that
> function; it leaves freeing in error cases to when the fc / ctx gets freed.
> 
> But tl;dr: I think we can remove the kfree and "= NULL" in this function,
> and defer the freeing in the error case.
> 
>>> +
>>> +static inline void clear_compression_spec(struct f2fs_fs_context *ctx)
>>> +{
>>> +   ctx->spec_mask &= ~(F2FS_SPEC_compress_algorithm
>>> +                                           | F2FS_SPEC_compress_log_size
>>> +                                           | F2FS_SPEC_compress_extension
>>> +                                           | F2FS_SPEC_nocompress_extension
>>> +                                           | F2FS_SPEC_compress_chksum
>>> +                                           | F2FS_SPEC_compress_mode);
>>
>> How about add a macro to include all compression macros, and use it to clean
>> up above codes?
> 
> That's a good idea and probably easy enough to do without rebase pain.
>  
>>> +
>>> +   if (f2fs_test_compress_extension(F2FS_CTX_INFO(ctx).noextensions,
>>> +                           F2FS_CTX_INFO(ctx).nocompress_ext_cnt,
>>> +                           F2FS_CTX_INFO(ctx).extensions,
>>> +                           F2FS_CTX_INFO(ctx).compress_ext_cnt)) {
>>> +           f2fs_err(sbi, "invalid compress or nocompress extension");
>>
>> Can you please describe what is detailed confliction in the log? e.g. new
>> noext conflicts w/ new ext...
> 
> Hmm, let me think about this. I had not noticed it was calling 
> f2fs_test_compress_extension 3 times, I wonder if there is a better option.
> I need to understand this approach better. Maybe Hongbo has thoughts.

Maybe:

f2fs_err(sbi, "new noextensions conflicts w/ new extensions");

> 
>>> +           return -EINVAL;
>>> +   }
>>> +   if (f2fs_test_compress_extension(F2FS_CTX_INFO(ctx).noextensions,
>>> +                           F2FS_CTX_INFO(ctx).nocompress_ext_cnt,
>>> +                           F2FS_OPTION(sbi).extensions,
>>> +                           F2FS_OPTION(sbi).compress_ext_cnt)) {
>>> +           f2fs_err(sbi, "invalid compress or nocompress extension");

f2fs_err(sbi, "new noextensions conflicts w/ old extensions");

>>
>> Ditto,
>>
>>> +           return -EINVAL;
>>> +   }
>>> +   if (f2fs_test_compress_extension(F2FS_OPTION(sbi).noextensions,
>>> +                           F2FS_OPTION(sbi).nocompress_ext_cnt,
>>> +                           F2FS_CTX_INFO(ctx).extensions,
>>> +                           F2FS_CTX_INFO(ctx).compress_ext_cnt)) {
>>> +           f2fs_err(sbi, "invalid compress or nocompress extension");

f2fs_err(sbi, "new extensions conflicts w/ old noextensions");

Then, user may get enough hint from log to update conflicted {no,}extensions
for mount.

Thanks,

>>
>> Ditto,
> 
> thanks,
> -Eric
> 



_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to