On 5/23/25 08:21, yohan.joung wrote:
> to allow users to dynamically tune
> the boost_zoned_gc_percent parameter
>
> Signed-off-by: yohan.joung <yohan.jo...@sk.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/gc.h | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.h b/fs/f2fs/gc.h
> index 5c1eaf55e127..f9ff68dc2bcc 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.h
> @@ -194,6 +194,8 @@ static inline bool has_enough_invalid_blocks(struct
> f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> static inline bool need_to_boost_gc(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> {
> if (f2fs_sb_has_blkzoned(sbi))
> - return !has_enough_free_blocks(sbi, LIMIT_BOOST_ZONED_GC);
> + return !has_enough_free_blocks(sbi,
> + sbi->gc_thread->boost_zoned_gc_percent < 100
> + ? sbi->gc_thread->boost_zoned_gc_percent : 100);
How about checking lower/upper boundary for boost_zoned_gc_percent
during setting its value via sysfs? Also update the manual page?
Then we can use sbi->gc_thread->boost_zoned_gc_percent directly here?
Thanks,
> return has_enough_invalid_blocks(sbi);
> }
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
