This conversion moved the folio_unlock() to inside __write_node_folio(),
but missed one caller so we had a double-unlock on this path.
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
Cc: Chao Yu <c...@kernel.org>
Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org>
Reported-by: syzbot+c0dc46208750f063d...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 80f31d2a7e5f (f2fs: return bool from __write_node_folio)
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <wi...@infradead.org>
---
fs/f2fs/node.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index 1cb4cba7f961..bfe104db284e 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -2078,7 +2078,6 @@ int f2fs_sync_node_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
if (!__write_node_folio(folio, false, &submitted,
wbc, do_balance, io_type, NULL)) {
- folio_unlock(folio);
folio_batch_release(&fbatch);
ret = -EIO;
goto out;
--
2.47.2
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
