Hi, On 6/12/25 05:58, Eric Biggers wrote:
But otherwise this style of hardware offload is basically obsolete and has been superseded by hardware-accelerated crypto instructions directly on the CPU as well as inline storage encryption (UFS/eMMC).
For desktop, yes, but embedded still has quite a few of these, for example the STM32 crypto offload engine, and I expect quite a few FPGA based implementations exist, so this would require vendors to maintain a fork to keep their out-of-tree drivers functional when updating the kernel.
POWER also has an asynchronous offload engine with AES, SHA and gzip support, these are significantly faster than the CPU.
If a buggy engine passes self-test, can this simply be fixed by adding more tests? :>
Simon _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
