Hello: This patch was applied to jaegeuk/f2fs.git (dev) by Jaegeuk Kim <[email protected]>:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 20:12:11 +0800 you wrote: > From: Yongpeng Yang <[email protected]> > > During SPO tests, when mounting F2FS, an -EINVAL error was returned from > f2fs_recover_inode_page. The issue occurred under the following scenario > > Thread A Thread B > f2fs_ioc_commit_atomic_write > - f2fs_do_sync_file // atomic = true > - f2fs_fsync_node_pages > : last_folio = inode folio > : schedule before folio_lock(last_folio) f2fs_write_checkpoint > - block_operations// writeback > last_folio > - schedule before > f2fs_flush_nat_entries > : set_fsync_mark(last_folio, 1) > : set_dentry_mark(last_folio, 1) > : folio_mark_dirty(last_folio) > - __write_node_folio(last_folio) > : f2fs_down_read(&sbi->node_write)//block > - f2fs_flush_nat_entries > : {struct nat_entry}->flag |= > BIT(IS_CHECKPOINTED) > - unblock_operations > : > f2fs_up_write(&sbi->node_write) > f2fs_write_checkpoint//return > : f2fs_do_write_node_page() > f2fs_ioc_commit_atomic_write//return > SPO > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [f2fs-dev,v5,1/1] f2fs: fix IS_CHECKPOINTED flag inconsistency issue caused by concurrent atomic commit and checkpoint writes https://git.kernel.org/jaegeuk/f2fs/c/7633a7387eb4 You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
