On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 10:21:00AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > OK, but since __fsverity_get_info() is just rhashtable_lookup_fast() what > prevents the CPU from reordering the hash table reads before the S_VERITY > check? I think you need a barrier in fsverity_get_info() to enforce the > proper ordering. The matching ordering during setting of S_VERITY is > implied by cmpxchg used to manipulate i_flags so that part should be fine.
Yes, probably. _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
