On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 03:51:56PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Do we want to throw in the towel here for the forseable future and if we
> ever need to support fsverity on > 64k page size just do a on-disk
> version rev?
>
> Because if so we could just simply the pending xfs fsverity support to
> drop all the offset adjustment and simplify it a lot..
I wholeheartedly agree. Especially given the benefit of large folios,
increasing the base page size beyond 64k has enough downsides without
compelling upsides that can't be achieved via other means, I'm highly
skeptical that page sizes > 64k is going to be appealing for most
system designers. So trying to design in support for this possibility
in fsverrity is not worth it.
- Ted
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
