On Wed, May 20, 2026, at 10:54 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 10:39:16AM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote: >> On Wed, May 20, 2026, at 10:31 AM, Mark Brown wrote: >> > On Thu, May 07, 2026 at 04:52:56AM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote: > >> > I'm seeing a regression in -next with the LTP statx04 test which bisects >> > to this commit: > >> > tst_tmpdir.c:316: TINFO: Using /tmp/LTP_sta8hUyB4 as tmpdir (tmpfs >> > filesystem) >> > tst_device.c:98: TINFO: Found free device 0 '/dev/loop0' >> > tst_test.c:2047: TINFO: LTP version: 20260130 >> > tst_test.c:2050: TINFO: Tested kernel: 7.1.0-rc4-next-20260520 #1 SMP >> > PREEMPT @1779279361 aarch64 > >> > ... > >> > tst_test.c:1985: TINFO: === Testing on vfat === >> > tst_test.c:1290: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop0 with vfat opts='' extra >> > opts='' >> > tst_test.c:1302: TINFO: Mounting /dev/loop0 to >> > /tmp/LTP_sta8hUyB4/mntpoint fstyp=vfat flags=0 >> > statx04.c:121: TFAIL: STATX_ATTR_COMPRESSED not supported >> > statx04.c:121: TFAIL: STATX_ATTR_APPEND not supported >> > statx04.c:121: TFAIL: STATX_ATTR_IMMUTABLE not supported >> > statx04.c:121: TFAIL: STATX_ATTR_NODUMP not supported > >> At first blush, that does not seem like a plausible bisect >> result. This commit shouldn't affect the behavior of tmpfs >> in any way. > > It's not testing tmpfs (well, it does but that passed), as the log above > shows it is making a vfat filesystem on a loop device backed by a file > that happens to be in a tmpfs and then testing that. There's a bunch of > filesystems covered in this manner: > > tst_test.c:1985: TINFO: === Testing on ext2 === > tst_test.c:1985: TINFO: === Testing on ext3 === > tst_test.c:1985: TINFO: === Testing on ext4 === > tst_test.c:1985: TINFO: === Testing on btrfs === > tst_test.c:1985: TINFO: === Testing on vfat === > tst_test.c:1985: TINFO: === Testing on tmpfs === OK. Is vfat the only failure in LTP statx04 ? -- Chuck Lever _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v14 03/15] fat: Implement fileattr_get for case sensitivity
Chuck Lever via Linux-f2fs-devel Wed, 20 May 2026 08:14:27 -0700
- [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v14 00/15] Exposi... Chuck Lever via Linux-f2fs-devel
- [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v14 02/15] f... Chuck Lever via Linux-f2fs-devel
- [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v14 01/15] f... Chuck Lever via Linux-f2fs-devel
- [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v14 04/15] e... Chuck Lever via Linux-f2fs-devel
- [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v14 05/15] n... Chuck Lever via Linux-f2fs-devel
- [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v14 08/15] x... Chuck Lever via Linux-f2fs-devel
- [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v14 09/15] c... Chuck Lever via Linux-f2fs-devel
- [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v14 06/15] h... Chuck Lever via Linux-f2fs-devel
- [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v14 03/15] f... Chuck Lever via Linux-f2fs-devel
- Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v14 ... Chuck Lever via Linux-f2fs-devel
- Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH ... Chuck Lever via Linux-f2fs-devel
- Re: [f2fs-dev] [PA... Chuck Lever via Linux-f2fs-devel
- Re: [f2fs-dev... Chuck Lever via Linux-f2fs-devel
- [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v14 12/15] i... Chuck Lever via Linux-f2fs-devel
- [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v14 11/15] v... Chuck Lever via Linux-f2fs-devel
- [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v14 07/15] h... Chuck Lever via Linux-f2fs-devel
- [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v14 10/15] n... Chuck Lever via Linux-f2fs-devel
- [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v14 13/15] n... Chuck Lever via Linux-f2fs-devel
- [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v14 14/15] n... Chuck Lever via Linux-f2fs-devel
- [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v14 15/15] k... Chuck Lever via Linux-f2fs-devel
- Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v14 00/1... Christian Brauner via Linux-f2fs-devel
